I don't think it's available, but the judge saw/heard the whole thing.well madanthonywayne...you are correct, I have no idea of the case.
lol...
got that evidence? tapes online? for me to look at
Whether that's true or not has no bearing on anything. Or are you saying that black guys should be allowed to cut off the heads of anyone they want without fear of sanction because some other black men may have been wrongfully convicted?If the jury finds you innocent you are. After all plenty of innocent black men get sent to jail in the US.
If the jury finds you innocent you are. After all plenty of innocent black men get sent to jail in the US.
OJ's previous trial had no bearing on this case. It would be illegal to do so on the part of the judge or jury.
He used a gun, he forced them to stay there against their will, he stole property. He will be elibible for parole in 6 years anyway.
I think its highly overdone. He most certainly did not deserve the sentence.
He didn't "get away" with murder. Opinions don't count, evidence does.
If the jury finds you innocent you are.
with no hard evidence
well madanthonywayne...you are correct, I have no idea of the case.
He didn't "get away" with murder. Opinions don't count, evidence does.
He didn't "get away" with murder. Opinions don't count, evidence does.