lol that was a good read.. who could have guessed that a child pornography thread could be so much fun to read.
peace.
peace.
Nude Child Photography OK?
- Thread starter Thoreau
- Start date
- Status
Bite him, you evil nutritional scientist from, ummm, muslim hell. May your LDL be high and your HDL be low. Bah.
Are you saying there is a biological basis for perversion?
Please cite your sources?
That does not have appropriate citations. Please support your claim with peer reviewed data.
Spinster means never been married. Doesn't apply.
Perhaps it is not your own opinions you incessantly post but the remnants of a past life.
Perhaps it is not your own opinions you incessantly post but the remnants of a past life.
Huh?
you're a real riot.
have any idea what makes a contract binding?
That does not have appropriate citations. Please support your claim with peer reviewed data.
does not compute.
peace.
Epoxy?
In this day and age that is simply not a yes or no question. In times past, an innocent photo of a new born baby was commonplace. I have some of those in my childhood photo book.
Now days taking a roll of film to a processing studio with such a photo on the negatives could get you thrown in jail.
I have taken a photo of my niece during a summer visit on digital format in a bath tub full of bubble bath and all you can see is her head, I feel this type of photo is fine, as did her parents and other family.
Photographing children in the nude now days just for the sake of art is not well accepted in out society. I have read horror stories in the news papers and on the net where a father or mother has taken in film for development with an innocent photo of a child running around in the house or at the beach nude and the police where call and charges ensued.
I am a professional photographer myself and I stay away from such photos. A photo of a fully clothed child is just as artistic, with out all the possible headaches that could arise if it was a nude photo.
Now days taking a roll of film to a processing studio with such a photo on the negatives could get you thrown in jail.
I have taken a photo of my niece during a summer visit on digital format in a bath tub full of bubble bath and all you can see is her head, I feel this type of photo is fine, as did her parents and other family.
Photographing children in the nude now days just for the sake of art is not well accepted in out society. I have read horror stories in the news papers and on the net where a father or mother has taken in film for development with an innocent photo of a child running around in the house or at the beach nude and the police where call and charges ensued.
I am a professional photographer myself and I stay away from such photos. A photo of a fully clothed child is just as artistic, with out all the possible headaches that could arise if it was a nude photo.
That's a creative idea but still room for it to be abused, and no lawmaker is into doing pedos a favor.
- Status