"uhhhh.....didn't YOU read MY response???
Check the last five posts. "
Thank you, I completely skipped over them.
"AND your entire .....premise revolves around the idea that language doesn't equal logic, hence some things are unexplainable"
No. My premise revolves around the fact that one needs absolutes - origin points which one can work from - to be able to define, explain, or understand something. The original chemical composition of our bodies was set up so we understood certain things without ever even thinking. Thus we work off of this tiny point and look what we can become. We define things from other things, but the original ideas were hard wired in our little fetus brains.
"Language being equal to logic simply means that in a Logic System, things are either illogical or logical. "
hmm IC. Well your words were very misleading. When you said Language=logic I took it to mean that anything that can be linguistified is logical, which was what I thought was completely retarded. But obviously something is illogical or logical, there is no between.
As to that, what is your point when telling us that language is either logical or not?
"How do you define these terms?? "
If I must use words to describe, those words are predefined. If they are not predefined, then how the hell are you supposed to understand them?
"Do you need other defined terms to define terms,used to define terms????"
As I explained above, one has had hardwired understanding of certain things at birth, and these include the ability to learn. Language can not explain every single concept, how could it be so perfect? I think THIS concept is easily understood when someone says there are no words to describe etc. etc.
"Circular reasoning?!?! "
Nope, perfectly linear. You do NOT define a word by what word it is used to define; THAT is circular. I am describing an infinite number of words used in a sequence to define the next word. Obviously there cannot be an infinite amound of words, and so this sequence is broken when a word cannot be defined by words, but is understood by the mind that uses and hears the word. This is why there are hard-to-define words such as one.
"What is the defintion of the concept "This" ?
What is the definition of the concept "That" ?"
Those are too simple. "this" refers to something that is in near proximity, "that" refers to something that is farther away.
"State an absolute, prove that its true, prove that it makes sense...... "
The definition of an absolute is that is needs no proof to be true, it is ASSUMED to be true. I can, however, attempt to prove that it makes sense. We assume that the world we see exists. Thus the absolute is "the world we see exists" (this is only an example) and obviously that is a sensical sentence. I can understand it but I can only assume that you can as well. It is sensical if you can understand it.
"That explains why you can't, haven't, and won't do it...... "
Oh? I thought I did.
I said:
"One is when you do not have multiple of something."
"It is a bit out of hand when a 17 year old can laugh out loud condescendingly but inadvertently...I am apologetic..... "
So, you're 17?
"Its just a bit irksome to be called .. whatever else one could find on the last three pages of this thread.....hahaha but it is amusing nevertheless."
lol thanks!
"Once again don't take anything personally"
I hope you try the same
"But like I said, you're missing my points, and you aren't refuting any of them.... "
I'm sorry, I tried. If you ask questions, theres a much better chance that I can answer them more straightforwardly.
o-