The Military made no statement on it for a while after that event. It wasn't until they realized it was making major headlines all over the world that they decided to falsely state
Take my Pheonix Lights case. Phlog above stated that it seemed very likely that what they saw was Chinese Lanterns.
''Oh, on evidence, a guy with a telescope looked at the Phoenix lights and saw aeroplanes. How's that for evidence? ''
Proof please.
Right, you keep avoiding all the shit you cannot answer. You are no scientist. You can't even conduct a proper talk on the subject. I'll just gather everything up and keep reposting it until you answer my suffiently.
His name is detailed on the Wikipedia page for the Phoenix lights.
"Mitch Stanley, an amateur astronomer, observed the lights using a Dobsonian telescope giving 43x magnification. After observing the lights, he told his mother, who was present at the time, that the lights were aircraft.[17] According to Stanley, the lights were quite clearly individual airplanes; a companion who was with him recalled asking Stanley at the time what the lights were, and he said, "Planes". (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenix_Lights)
Rubbish. I can discount his claim easily. You should have known IMMEDIATELY, if you have taken courses in physics, planes cannot stay in one location at any time for any long periods of time. GEEEEZZEEE... who am I talking too???:bugeye:
Not only that, but tons of witnesses reported no sound from these objects. But even if there was sound, it certainly wasn't planes. That is a physical, scientific impossibility.
You are starting to make that dear woman in the documentary look like Einstein :bugeye:
You are assuming that what the objects actually did, not just what they appeared to do. Also, some witnesses reported 'the formation' to have 'flown overhead' so it was not stationary, according to some. You need to re-read your research bub.
I live near the busiest freight airport in the UK. I see lots of planes, especially at night, with their running lights. I seldom hear any. That doesn't mean they aren't making any noise, just that I can't hear it. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence!
And again you discount the eye witness testimony that said at least one phenomena WAS planes.
Oh please, that woman is a flake. She made a dumbass statement that ruined her credibiity. I on the other hand have been researching UFO and ETI visitation for a long time, and you know why? BECAUSE I'D LOVE IT TO BE TRUE! But so far, I have not seen a single convincing shred of evidence. Not one. Do you understand, I WANT TO BELIEVE.
Phlog, we have went from military flares. Discredited. Then we went to chinese Lanterns. Discredited. Now you are clutching onto straws with planes...
What next... birds with lights attached?
I never claimed the Phoenix lights were chinese lanterns. Read, comprehend, become CREDIBLE.
A documentary made by the woman that wrote (and profited) from a book?
Quote:
"it seemed an intelligent presence was staring back"
when eye witnesses come out with crap like that, you know they are delusional.
Sounds to me like she saw a formation of chinese lanterns. Here's a vid I took of chinese lanterns:
http://youtu.be/h_Djd8kJ6n8
Please, you need some discernment.
Sounds like Stanely is a bit of a freak --- a total jackass skeptic who just wanted to add to tales to debunk the claims as best he could.
Post 159
Still claiming you never said that Phlog?????
You discount this eye witness testimony simply because it doesn't fit with your preconceived ideas. That's unscientific.
Riddle me this, why are there no decent photographs of this 'object'. All of the people that looked up, and not one of them got a photo with a long lens?
Just how is that possible?
Yes I said that, and if you watched the video, that was her talking about a formation of three lights she'd witnessed some years before the phoenix lights, she wasn't talking about the Phoenix lights, so neither was I!
Read, COMPREHEND.