NEW Moon Structures?

SkinWalker said:
If you think you're being innovative and observant by citing "bridges" on a world that only a few people have visited a handfull of times, or that someone forgot to turn off a spotlight (a large rock with the Sun's illumination judging by the shadow), then don't waste our time.

You're making some very extraordinary claims and merely providing some blurry black and white photos of rocks, which you say are the best you've seen.

I'm more inclined to discuss the power of belief and what drives people to look for extraordinary explanations for ordinary things. Your thread got dumped in the right forum.

Boris2 and RedDevil might remember the passage in Demon Haunted World where Sagan discusses the natural ability and tendency of people to look for patterns... a similar phenomenon is common among those that see cities and monuments on Mars.
Click to expand...

Skinwalker, I thank God you're not running NASA. It would be their job to find these type of buildings USING EXACTLY THESE LOW QUALITY IMAGES. The idea that finding vehicles or buildings built by an alien civilization is crazy, represents the arrogance that now run's mainstream science.

In the end it is you're debunking skeptical mindset which will not allow you to EVER consider that anomalies do exist within the lunar orbiter series exist and even further.

Using the debunker's logic there are no anomalies because everything is just a pile of rocks.

Please - you're the ones wasting our time. You're response is the waste of time.

Oh yeah, and from satelite every building on Earth looks like a pile of rocks with shadows. Who do you think you're kidding?
 
Last edited:
Actually, it is you who is wasting your own time. If you want to
speculate on your photo, have fun. But it certainly does not even
meet the barest minimum standard of proof that science would
require. Don't misunderstand; many of us believe there could
well be life beyond earth. We just have not seen proof as yet.

:m: Peace.
 
If you can't name one anomaly that you found interesting - then you are close minded and wasting everyones time.

You don't have to respond and if you do, knowing you are going to claim it's nothing but a pile of rocks - then IT'S YOUR TIME.

I have found NUMEROUS anomalies on the Moon and the Asteroid Eros which could be something important. It's you're inability to have an open mind and learn another phrase other than, "some rocks" which wastes everyones time.

Nice try to turn this around on me - but it's not my fault you and a lot of people on here are too close minded to handle it.
 
BTW - Here are some of the ones found on Eros..

erosgrid2ao.gif


Can anyone explain the perfect grid across the face of the "ROCK"?

I don't know that any of you will, so if you don't know then just say it's a pile of rocks.
 
Please show a single proof that they are buildings or bridges.
Additionally, where on Northwester's site are the images you
are showing us. Those in this thread are not hosted there.

:m: Peace.
 
Some see craterchains, some see bridges, some see little jumping sheep.
Why do I see only "bloody" moon-rock in those pictures?
Ah, maybe because it is just moon-rock?!
 
Your mind i jsut palyign tricks on you... Oh wow, the cloud is shaped exactly like a donkey... Does it mean it is a donkey?
 
Report your 'anomalies' to NASA, see if they care, see if they just say its just a bunch of rocks... Are they then close minded? I do not presume so...
 
btimsah said:
Using the debunker's logic there are no anomalies because everything is just a pile of rocks.

Please - you're the ones wasting our time. You're response is the waste of time.
Click to expand...

STFU, Fluid.
 
Star_One said:
I must admit, the photo of the "Bridges" does look like some kind of bridge,structure.

What we need is clearer photos!, hopefully these new probes will take some higher quality photos of the moon.
Click to expand...

EXACTLY, star_one! I was wondering when those would start sending us images?

The other people are just pretending not to see anything really.. lol. It's their M.O.

I might do a higher-quality examination of the bridge one because it is a bit faint. However, you can see it rather obviously if some would allow themselves too! :D
 
Hypercane said:
Report your 'anomalies' to NASA, see if they care, see if they just say its just a bunch of rocks... Are they then close minded? I do not presume so...
Click to expand...

I've thought about reporting this too NASA to ask if they've seen such things before. Problem is, they may have a security policy in place in which they would not be allowed to discuss such thing's? :confused: The testimony of Donna Hare and Carl Wolf who worked at NASA and the NSA both say NASA does cover up certain things.

I've tried to contact NASA before but typically I get some clueless person who responds about a year later, claiming no knowlege. Doesnt help much.

One would have to assume NASA has seen these interesting formations.

Even if some of you are trying to write them off as rocks - back in the 1960's I don't believe NASA could do that. You could only write these off as rocks if you knew for a fact that ALIENS DO NOT EXIST. Otherwise there is a slight possibility they are NOT ROCKS and possibly something else due to the unusual nature of their formation and apperance. ;)
 
due to the unn nature of their formation and apperance.
Click to expand...
Please highlight in the pictures the places that seem unnatural to you and are not met naturally on earth or some other celestial body.
 
Here's what I get after running the image through the latest image enhancement algorithm, obtained from a contact on the CSI set:

<img src="/attachment.php?attachmentid=3603&stc=1>
 
blackholesun said:
Ok here is the image inverted. I fail to see any outlines of these "shadows" given the angle of the sun.

attachment.php
Click to expand...

screenhunter008e8mw.jpg


Inverting it did not really matter either. It just reversed the values, but the lines going across the depression still existed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top