ghost, I was grateful for your various links, but now you're just reproducing an article whole ... I want to know your view. I just today read an article by the nephew of the former President of the Jehovah's Witnesses in which he discovered that the JW way was not the only possible interpretation of scripture.
Ghost7584, I want you to come forward with some thinking of your own on this issue - on the King James Bible. Take a look at that link by Sarkus, there's not that much right about the textus receptus, and very little right about the KJV except the quality of the English prose (about which you will get no argument from me).
Oh, wait - we're not on my KJV discussion thread. See you there.
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=44806
Ghost7584, I want you to come forward with some thinking of your own on this issue - on the King James Bible. Take a look at that link by Sarkus, there's not that much right about the textus receptus, and very little right about the KJV except the quality of the English prose (about which you will get no argument from me).
Oh, wait - we're not on my KJV discussion thread. See you there.
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=44806
Last edited: