Mystech and wesmarch's discusion

Originally posted by okinrus
However if we assume God does not exist then his
non-existance exists and so defines an existant entity.
This entity has existed since the beginning of time and
always exist as long as God doesn't exist. However
then the entity becomes God and so this contradicts
God not existing.

What exactly are you smoking that you can't tell the difference between non-existence and existence. A lack of something is not an entity, I'm sorry.
 
Originally posted by Mystech
There is a world of difference between faith and an educated guess :p

That depends on if you BELIEVE in the results from the educated guess or not eh?
 
You don't have to believe in the results of an experiment, only observe them :p
 
Originally posted by Mystech
You don't have to believe in the results of an experiment, only observe them :p

We'll have to pick this up another time. :D
 
if you guys hadnt have done that i was going to split the thread so thank you for coming back on topic
 
Actually... could you split it?:) I'm interested in watching this discussion pan out
 
if you can hold onto the discussion for 2 days and give me a good title and the section to put it in (with reasons PM'ed to me), sure

but i have an exam now so right now, no
 
this is by request, it probably wont stay in ethics for long tho

i hope i got all the right posts, if i didnt tell me and i will undo those posts
 
Back
Top