Quite obviously, the rights and roles of women have changed over the years in order to give them more liberties and more rights. In the past, women were thought of as caretakers, home-keepers, wives, and mothers. These were there roles, and the man was typically the dominant head of household, and made most of the decisions. This is the "classic" scenario: the man works and brings home the money, and the wife takes care of the children and the home.
Now, of course, women are considered the equals to men, and of course, I think that this is a good thing. However, does "equal" before the law necessarily mean "similar"? As a very old-fashioned person myself, I do believe that women, while they are equal to men, still hold different positions and should bear different responsibilities.
I don't have any problem with women who don't conform, though; I'm just saying that, in my opinion, the traditional family structure was the "good" outline
So what is your opinion?
Men and women are equal, but do you think that means "equal" in an absolute sense or "equal but different"?
i think you could apply this on an individual level as well, saying we're all equal but different, and we all have a unique role.
but generally, there are some differences between the majority of men vs the majority of women, and i don't see that as any type of inequality. i think that when those differences are embraced, and not resented, that they compliment each other fairly well.
now specifically, we are all at some point on the gender spectrum, with polar opposites being entirely masculine and entirely feminine. no one resides at the poles. there are some women who are more masculine than some men and vice versa, and there are some who are right smack dab in the middle. because of that, i like to see people as being complementary on an individual level.