Men an porn.!!!

Is it natural/normal for men to like watchin porn.???

  • Yes

    Votes: 5 62.5%
  • No

    Votes: 1 12.5%
  • Yes... an its misogynistic

    Votes: 2 25.0%

  • Total voters
    8
I don't care about privacy, it's a myth on the internet anyways. Yes, [some] men like to watch porn. Some women like to watch porn, example A: 50 shades of grey.. lol
 
100 years ago men/women didn't have "porn" to view as we have it today. Before that there wasn't any porn either but there was many types of sexy dancing, stage shows like Burlesque, Cabarets and saloon dancers doing the Can Can that were considered very provocative during those times. Everyone can see, for the most part, so I'd say that both men/women can watch anything and that includes porn. How many do so I really can't say because only about 10 percent of the worlds population have the internet to use. Of course there's always magazines to buy that contain porn but again I do not know how many of those magazines are bought by everyone.
 
I do not think porn is like sex between two people.

Also females watch porn too, so targeting males with this poll is wrong.

So my answer is porn is nothing like real sex, and is something distanced from sex between people. I do not know how it works, but i doubt the reason people watch it, is for sex.

I do not believe sex and porn is same thing. Also i think people that hate the idea of sex can watch porn, as they are different. I think porn works differently and is something that is not sex, although it seems to most it is.
 
You can get a lot of interior decorating tips.

I am just saying, i do not believe watching porn and having sex are similar in how it works. I think you are doing two different things personally. But most people jump to the conclusion that porn is just sex, but i reckon its not, and people are doing something else when watching porn.
 
... people are doing something else when watching porn.
Exactly what is it that you think they're doing?

Personally, I'm thinking, "A naked blonde would look good on my couch - but a redhead would clash with the drapes."
 
Voated? ;):p
Must be a distracting topic, lol...

I don't care about privacy, it's a myth on the internet anyways. Yes, [some] men like to watch porn. Some women like to watch porn, example A: 50 shades of grey.. lol

Also females watch porn too, so targeting males with this poll is wrong.

Ok sure... how we voated coud prolly be found out by mods but they are trusted an woudnt tell anybody... an sure some woman likes to watch porn also but this thred is intended to be about men.!!!

100 years ago men/women didn't have "porn" to view as we have it today. Before that there wasn't any porn either but there was many types of sexy dancing, stage shows like Burlesque, Cabarets and saloon dancers doing the Can Can that were considered very provocative during those times. Everyone can see, for the most part, so I'd say that both men/women can watch anything and that includes porn. How many do so I really can't say because only about 10 percent of the worlds population have the internet to use. Of course there's always magazines to buy that contain porn but again I do not know how many of those magazines are bought by everyone.

Sounds like you thank its normal/natural for men to like to watch porn... but can it be done in a non-misogynistic way.???
 
Personally, I'm thinking, "A naked blonde would look good on my couch - but a redhead would clash with the drapes."

So far... only 50 % of the voat thanks men likin to watch porn is natural/normal... an the other half thanks its not normal/natural... or at least misogynistic.!!!
 
I am just saying, i do not believe watching porn and having sex are similar in how it works. I think you are doing two different things personally. But most people jump to the conclusion that porn is just sex, but i reckon its not, and people are doing something else when watching porn.

I agree.
Porn is about sexual relief.
Porn is a male thing. It's stupid.
Women have their own drivel, about the things stupid things women want. It's called Chicklit.
You may have seen your wife or your servants reading stuff like this:


A Shore Thing
by Nicole "Snooki" Polizzi

It’s a summer to remember . . . at the Jersey Shore.

Giovanna “Gia” Spumanti and her cousin Isabella “Bella” Rizzoli are going to have the sexiest summer ever. While they couldn’t be more different—pint-size Gia is a carefree, outspoken party girl and Bella is a tall, slender athlete who always holds her tongue—for the next month they’re ready to pouf up their hair, put on their stilettos, and soak up all that Seaside Heights, New Jersey, has to offer: hot guidos, cool clubs, fried Oreos, and lots of tequila.

So far, Gia’s summer is on fire. Between nearly burning down their rented bungalow, inventing the popular “tan-tags” at the Tantastic Salon where she works, and rescuing a shark on the beach, she becomes a local celebrity overnight. Luckily, she meets the perfect guy to help her keep the flames under control. Firefighter Frank Rossi is exactly her type: big, tan, and Italian. But is he tough enough to handle Gia when things really heat up?

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/10031701-a-shore-thing
 
I agree.
Porn is about sexual relief.
And here I thought it was about the great scripts and acting.

Porn is a male thing. It's stupid.
Why do you think it is solely a male thing?

1 in 3 viewers of porn are women.
Women have their own drivel, about the things stupid things women want. It's called Chicklit.
You don't know many women, do you?

And "chick lit" is not exactly erotic fiction. What they tend to touch on is issues that affect women in society, usually written with a lot of humour.

Women do read erotica, however, and they do watch porn. I wouldn't call that chick lit.

I mean honestly, who has never read of Histoire d'O by Pauline Réage? Or most of the works by Anaïs Nin? That is erotic fiction. Chick lit does not even compare.

You may have seen your wife or your servants reading stuff like this:


A Shore Thing
by Nicole "Snooki" Polizzi

It’s a summer to remember . . . at the Jersey Shore.

Giovanna “Gia” Spumanti and her cousin Isabella “Bella” Rizzoli are going to have the sexiest summer ever. While they couldn’t be more different—pint-size Gia is a carefree, outspoken party girl and Bella is a tall, slender athlete who always holds her tongue—for the next month they’re ready to pouf up their hair, put on their stilettos, and soak up all that Seaside Heights, New Jersey, has to offer: hot guidos, cool clubs, fried Oreos, and lots of tequila.

So far, Gia’s summer is on fire. Between nearly burning down their rented bungalow, inventing the popular “tan-tags” at the Tantastic Salon where she works, and rescuing a shark on the beach, she becomes a local celebrity overnight. Luckily, she meets the perfect guy to help her keep the flames under control. Firefighter Frank Rossi is exactly her type: big, tan, and Italian. But is he tough enough to handle Gia when things really heat up?

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/10031701-a-shore-thing
I have never even heard of this person...

Might I suggest you visit a book store and start reading real books?
 
This, That, and the Other

Bells said:

I have never even heard of this person...

Reality TV icon.

And "chick lit" is not exactly erotic fiction. What they tend to touch on is issues that affect women in society, usually written with a lot of humour.

Ask a guy about chick lit, and he will tell you it's porn. Give a guy a chick lit book, and he won't read it.

Go figure.

• • •​

CluelussHusbund said:

Sounds like you thank its normal/natural for men to like to watch porn... but can it be done in a non-misogynistic way.???

Of course it can.

Watch gay porn.

I mean, really. Talk about duh.

• • •​

A note aside: Anyone ever wondering about the question of misogyny at Sciforums simply need answer the following question: How does a thread on "men and porn" end up as a discussion of "chick lit"?
 
Reality TV icon.
Would explain why I have never heard of them then.

Ask a guy about chick lit, and he will tell you it's porn. Give a guy a chick lit book, and he won't read it.

Go figure.
I remember someone giving me a Jane Costello book to read when I was in hospital a while ago. Why they gave it to me, I have no idea. It wasn't in any way realistic, but for those few hours, I stopped thinking and just read crap. And it was crap. And completely non-erotic, so I can't understand why he thinks it classifies as women's version of written porn or smut.

Of course it can.

Watch gay porn.

I mean, really. Talk about duh.
Glad I wasn't the only one who noticed that omission.

A note aside: Anyone ever wondering about the question of misogyny at Sciforums simply need answer the following question: How does a thread on "men and porn" end up as a discussion of "chick lit"?
Apparently chick lit is akin to pornography for women.. Still trying to figure that one out. Because I don't recall ever reading about rubber sheets and oil in any chick lit books I have been unfortunate enough to have glanced at, let alone lurid details of sex as one often sees on display in porn.
 
Last edited:
Lederhosen, Diapers, and a Rattan Cane ... and Other Notes

Bells said:

Because I don't recall ever reading about rubber sheets and oil in any chick lit books I have been unfortunate enough to have glanced at, let alone lurid details of sex as one often sees on display in porn.

I remember when I was a kid, stealing my dad's Hustler and all that sort of thing, and to this day ....

At any rate, lederhosen, diapers, and a rattan cane. Figure out the rest, with the only other clue being that the letter was allegedly written by a fifty year-old man from the midwest recalling his mother and speculating about the wife he didn't have.

What I find fascinating about pornography is the glimpse it gives us into the creator's mind. To wit, I recently encountered what really should be disturbing pornography, but in the end just turns out to be boring. I don't know, maybe the idea of "casting couch" sexual exploitation seems so ... um ... er ... right. But this team had the (ahem!) "right" idea, as they went with split screens showing penetration on one side, and the woman's distressed facial expression on the other. Unfortunately, it's probably more popular with other people who want to be that guy, but I say they had the "right" idea in comparison to another phenomenon, which I think I've settled on the term nut and pucker to describe. In this case, the cameraman seems to think that what men want to see is another man's scrotum and sphincter bouncing up and down on the screen. I really have no idea what to tell you about Japanese molester porn, except that it is an incredible phenomenon.

(Note aside: I checked in on Jane Costello's website, and noticed a tweet in the sidebar: "Checked into our villa in Orlando and found some familiar reading material left by the previous guests." I can only wonder why it was left behind. And reading the synopses? It's not so much judging a book by its cover, but holy shit, really?)​

But it has to be a rattan cane, y'know?
 
I remember when I was a kid, stealing my dad's Hustler and all that sort of thing, and to this day ....

At any rate, lederhosen, diapers, and a rattan cane. Figure out the rest, with the only other clue being that the letter was allegedly written by a fifty year-old man from the midwest recalling his mother and speculating about the wife he didn't have.
I remember a while ago now, a friend of my ex husband heard us joking about handcuffs in the bedroom and he turned around and said 'oh you should get the spider web'.. When asked what it was, we were told it was a rubber sheet that attaches to all posts of the bed, with spider web type ties at each end.. You can guess the rest from there.. And then he told us we should always make sure to use baby oil with it.. Never ever saw that guy in the same light again after that discussion.

But fantasy porn.. people are into some weird stuff.

What I find fascinating about pornography is the glimpse it gives us into the creator's mind. To wit, I recently encountered what really should be disturbing pornography, but in the end just turns out to be boring. I don't know, maybe the idea of "casting couch" sexual exploitation seems so ... um ... er ... right. But this team had the (ahem!) "right" idea, as they went with split screens showing penetration on one side, and the woman's distressed facial expression on the other. Unfortunately, it's probably more popular with other people who want to be that guy, but I say they had the "right" idea in comparison to another phenomenon, which I think I've settled on the term nut and pucker to describe. In this case, the cameraman seems to think that what men want to see is another man's scrotum and sphincter bouncing up and down on the screen. I really have no idea what to tell you about Japanese molester porn, except that it is an incredible phenomenon.
Porn is a lot more hard core now than it used to be. A lot more visual and in your face. But the formula is always the same. Same shots.. Same dodgy music..

(Note aside: I checked in on Jane Costello's website, and noticed a tweet in the sidebar: "Checked into our villa in Orlando and found some familiar reading material left by the previous guests." I can only wonder why it was left behind. And reading the synopses? It's not so much judging a book by its cover, but holy shit, really?)​

But it has to be a rattan cane, y'know?
Frankly, all I can say is thank Christ for the morphine drip.
 
I don't know if it's natural or normal or what not... but personally? Porn just never did it for me... I mean, in general, they (the people making porn) take the most unusually large men, cram them repeatedly into women who, for all intents and purposes, often seem to be in pain, and... yeah. I mean, if I wanted to watch some dudes ass going up and down as he rode some chick (or guy on guy or girl on girl if you are into that) then sure... but honestly? Just doesn't do it for me.

You can ask my wife - looks are nothing to me if there isn't an equally beautiful mind backing them up; it's one of the things I'm so grateful for with her. I can carry on a conversation about virtually any topic and even if she isn't as well versed in it as I am, she can keep up and, in many subjects, she can challenge me. I love that - to be able to hold an intellectually stimulating conversation is... well, I don't know if I'd say it is a turn-on (it isn't necessarily erotic, though sometimes depending on the subject matter it can be for both of us) but it's just awesome to know that we're able to connect like that, as well as in the more traditional physical sense :)

But yeah... porn just... I dunno. It doesn't help at all that when I worked with the Geek Squad and we had to do Data Transfers, more than once we found stuff that appeared to be Child Porn... the procedure for that was absolute. We had to call a store manager over, copy the file to a flash drive, take it to the back, and make sure it wasn't actually child porn (there was an AWFUL lot of stuff where it was 18 year olds pretending to be minors, as well as a lot of "rape fetish", "kidnap fetish", and other such ilk) - if it was (and it happened twice), we reported it to the police.

Of course we never went digging around for the stuff, but the software we used for data transfers showed the filenames as they were being transferred, and when you see a several gigabyte folder labeled "Underage and cock suckled" or "Sixteen Year Old Double Penetration" or the like, it just made you want to bang your head against a wall because you knew your day was shot... it was almost as bad as the Omega Directive in Star Trek!

As for the kinky stuff... *shrugs* I'm not one to judge. A little light bondage can be fun at times - you are placing absolute and total trust in the other person, not to mention the excitement of not knowing whats going on... but the hardcore stuff just seems like it'd hurt more than anything... I dunno *shrugs again*
 
This poll is a bit slated, after all it's imply "Is it normal for men to watch porn", which implies that if it gets a majority vote that its "Not normal to not watch porn", which to be perfectly honest is normal to some. So by that reasoning the actually thread itself is pointless for any true demographics, since people do and don't watch porn, normal or not.
 
Why do they put soft porn in ads, and movies and tv? You are watching virtual porn if you watch todays music vids, or movies anyway. Its everywhere.

You can be sure it effects females just as much as most males. Remember not everyone responds to what stimulates everyone.
 
Back
Top