Masturbation is for Losers
- Thread starter Lori_7
- Start date
- Status
i havent masterbated in years,
it wastes jing energy anyway,
i save my sexual energy all for my beautiful young wife.
peace.
it wastes jing energy anyway,
i save my sexual energy all for my beautiful young wife.
peace.
I appear to have joined in late, although I have read back the last few pages.
So far as scientific accuracy goes, it seems you would need many pictures of the same person, taken on different occasions, from different angles before you could start spotting trends. Also you should discount any pictures that have been posed for, since these people will have been told how to stand, particularly those photos of attactive females who all have the same posture. They are posed like that because it makes them more appealing than standing to attention.
So far as scientific accuracy goes, it seems you would need many pictures of the same person, taken on different occasions, from different angles before you could start spotting trends. Also you should discount any pictures that have been posed for, since these people will have been told how to stand, particularly those photos of attactive females who all have the same posture. They are posed like that because it makes them more appealing than standing to attention.
I'm not sure if I can keep posting on this thread.
I'm not sure what I can say to someone who won't acknowledge photo angles, or claims masturbation causes aids.
To be honest, I feel a bit bad about being rude to you happeh.
However you have been offensive and rude to many other people so much that I don't think you've given them any other choice.
I'm not sure what I can say to someone who won't acknowledge photo angles, or claims masturbation causes aids.
To be honest, I feel a bit bad about being rude to you happeh.
However you have been offensive and rude to many other people so much that I don't think you've given them any other choice.
Happeh
From the evidence you've posted, and what I have seen of the theory on your websites, I havent seen any examples of a study where you have used many shots of the same person. The only photos I've been able to look at show no consistancy and it appears that they may have been selected simply because they appear to suit the cause.
A photographer looking to maximise the sex appeal of a female model, will want to draw attention to her natual curves. It is afterall, these curves which we are (well in the interests of accuracy 'I am') attracted to in a woman. Leaning to one side will do this, increasing the curve of the hips. I'll confess to not knowing the details of this beyond a most basic level, but thats why glossy mens magazines pay their photographers, and not me.
From the evidence you've posted, and what I have seen of the theory on your websites, I havent seen any examples of a study where you have used many shots of the same person. The only photos I've been able to look at show no consistancy and it appears that they may have been selected simply because they appear to suit the cause.
A photographer looking to maximise the sex appeal of a female model, will want to draw attention to her natual curves. It is afterall, these curves which we are (well in the interests of accuracy 'I am') attracted to in a woman. Leaning to one side will do this, increasing the curve of the hips. I'll confess to not knowing the details of this beyond a most basic level, but thats why glossy mens magazines pay their photographers, and not me.
why?Huwy said:
think about this huwy.
a man walks up to you at a bus stop
pulls out a wad of photos
then starts saying "these people masturbate"
you ask "how do you know"
and happeh says "look at their shoulders", "look how their heads lean to the righ, "look at how one of their eyes are squinty", "look at the damaged areas"
on further questioning you find out what you have on this thread
now i ask "what kind of person are you dealing with?"
edit
to be honest with you huwy
i would think i was dealing with a nut case
like i said before, happeh's face reading is a total joke
Last edited:
kjun said:
That is true.
kjun said:
If I was talking about Leprosy, I think it would seem logical that I only posted pictures of people with leprosy. They suit the case of Leprosy.
kjun said:
This is where I am the expert and people should listen to me. I do not say that as braggodocio. It is simple fact. The photographer basically sees the signs of Happeh Theory. He would not describe it anything at all like I do. He might say he only knows what looks good. Because I am interested in science, I have gone the further step of analyzing and breaking down how "what looks good" works.
A photographer or a hairdresser are two people who see what I see. I would guess sports scouts, fighters, Coaches or any other person who finds it necessary to judge the physical qualifications of other people also see the same things I do. You never hear of them because they stick to their speciality.
You could say that I went to the coaches and hairdressers etc, learned what they know, then came back over here to you scientists to try and translate it from hairdresser speak into science speak. Or from coach speak into science speak.
Okay, this may have been mentioned before in this long-ass thread, but I'm going for it anyway.
First off, I have responded to Happeh's other thread about his theory. I mentioned the fact that my right leg is shorter than my left and I've leaned towards my right side way before I even started masturbating with my right hand.
Second, do you ever wonder if people just lean towards their dominant side. I mean, even if they don't masturbate, their dominant side will get stronger from using it to write all the time, or hold something (like a phone), or to wipe their ass...
Muscle is heavier than fat you know. Perhaps the only people that don't masturbate, according to Happeh, are people who are ambidextrous.
First off, I have responded to Happeh's other thread about his theory. I mentioned the fact that my right leg is shorter than my left and I've leaned towards my right side way before I even started masturbating with my right hand.
Second, do you ever wonder if people just lean towards their dominant side. I mean, even if they don't masturbate, their dominant side will get stronger from using it to write all the time, or hold something (like a phone), or to wipe their ass...
Muscle is heavier than fat you know. Perhaps the only people that don't masturbate, according to Happeh, are people who are ambidextrous.
Spud said:
You are the first reasonable person to post in this long ass thread.
Yes. Some people will naturally lean towards the dominant side. This is related to the "excessive physical exercise" reasons for Happeh Theory. If you are right handed, your right hand is dominant. It will be completely natural for a person to show slight Happeh Theory symptoms of leaning to the right.
It is the degree of the symptoms that tips them from being normal over into being unhealthy.
- Status