Master Theory (MT) is a theory of relativistic.
MT satisfies the same conditions, which satisfies Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity (SRT).
Experimental evidence, confirmative SRT, confirm MT.
The difference in interpretation and in a results of experiments that are not public.
For example: in scientific literature there is no experimental confirmation of a formulas:
In MT time is absolute therefore heve not "Twin Paradox".
In MT light speed, acceleration and mass is absolute (do not depend on the speed and are the same in all Inertial Frame).
Inertial Frame (IF) are equal in rights.
You can ask me: Einstein's task has non-unique solution?
My answer: YES!
How can this be?
My answer: Please note that a transverse coordinates ($$y$$ and $$z$$) of Lorentz Transformations are absolute (whereas Einstein asserted that in his theory of everything is relative).
Einstein (had no no reason for it) gave the absoluteness for a transverse coordinates, but not for - time.
I exempt the transverse coordinates ($$y$$ and $$z$$) from Einstein's absoluteness.
I to do free from Einstein's absoluteness the transverse coordinates (I set relative it, I set dependence on velocity for it).
So I got a free parameter.
For each value of this parameter, you can build a individual theory of relativity, which will exist as scientific theory on equal terms with SRT.
Moreover, because the transverse scale also depends on the speed (diminishing) - it is possible to solve the paradox of Ehrenfest (the paradox of a rotating disk).
Thus, Einstein's task has an infinite number of possible solutions, and SRT - only one solution of this infinite set.
Among this infinite number of solutions I've found one, in which time is absolute.
I call this theory: "Master Theory".
Only this theory is correct because it have not SRT's paradoxes.
So: Master Theory have absolutely time, and this difference has profound implications. (For example: in Master Theory are absent "Twin Paradox" and "Ehrenfest's Paradox".)
MT satisfies the same conditions, which satisfies Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity (SRT).
Experimental evidence, confirmative SRT, confirm MT.
The difference in interpretation and in a results of experiments that are not public.
For example: in scientific literature there is no experimental confirmation of a formulas:
$$E=mc^2/\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}$$
$$p=mv/\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}$$
In Master Theory these formulas is stale.$$p=mv/\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}$$
In MT time is absolute therefore heve not "Twin Paradox".
In MT light speed, acceleration and mass is absolute (do not depend on the speed and are the same in all Inertial Frame).
Inertial Frame (IF) are equal in rights.
You can ask me: Einstein's task has non-unique solution?
My answer: YES!
How can this be?
My answer: Please note that a transverse coordinates ($$y$$ and $$z$$) of Lorentz Transformations are absolute (whereas Einstein asserted that in his theory of everything is relative).
Einstein (had no no reason for it) gave the absoluteness for a transverse coordinates, but not for - time.
I exempt the transverse coordinates ($$y$$ and $$z$$) from Einstein's absoluteness.
I to do free from Einstein's absoluteness the transverse coordinates (I set relative it, I set dependence on velocity for it).
So I got a free parameter.
For each value of this parameter, you can build a individual theory of relativity, which will exist as scientific theory on equal terms with SRT.
Moreover, because the transverse scale also depends on the speed (diminishing) - it is possible to solve the paradox of Ehrenfest (the paradox of a rotating disk).
Thus, Einstein's task has an infinite number of possible solutions, and SRT - only one solution of this infinite set.
Among this infinite number of solutions I've found one, in which time is absolute.
I call this theory: "Master Theory".
Only this theory is correct because it have not SRT's paradoxes.
So: Master Theory have absolutely time, and this difference has profound implications. (For example: in Master Theory are absent "Twin Paradox" and "Ehrenfest's Paradox".)
Last edited: