There is nothing wrong with the perspective that bad things happening to one's family and their children should be avoided if possible, that immanent loss of things cared for is cause for resistance and if failed regret.forrest said:By horrific mass death, usually, setting up another boom. Even extinction, in this case of cultures that people are fond of.
Yep, sometimes. But I don't consider it horrific. That's pretty much a matter of perspective. Again, this is all quite natural. If the human race consumed itself into extinction, I can assure you it would be no more a big a deal than any other species that have gone extinct before us.
And the immediate question has nothing to do with extinction, but rather with the low equilibria enforced on those who fail to manage their ecological affairs - or sociological ?
Of course it is. It's exactly the kind of thing that governance is for. It may be incapable, and fail, but the matter is right in the center of the responsibilities.foirrest said:How will the american government would be able to curb the ever increasing population?
They won't. They can't Again this is not the responsibility of the U.S. government or any institution.