Anyone have any ideas?
Anyone think this is not the case?
If so, how can you deny the facts?
Polar bears basically are a marine mammal or are at least at the stage of turning into one. They swim for miles in the open ocean and hunt other marine mammals. They happen to be the most intelligent in the bear family. I can see how this is required. They need alot of brains to locate and sneak up on seal colonies resting on remote ice bergs. Other bears have it easy in comparison.
But what about whales? Do they really need all that intelligence? In particular baleen whales, all they really need to do is swim around with their mouths open. They have alot of left over brain power that is not required for their survival, this can be seen by the way they have made up dances and songs.
Now this is something I can't wait to have answered, which came first? Toothed whales or baleen?
If, as I suspect, the answer is toothed whales than I think that explains the left over intelligence of the baleens and I think it might give indications of how humans could have ended up with "too much" intelligence.
The transition from land to water was a big ask for the whales ancestors and they would have faced lots of trying times. Alot like the polar bear. The most intelligent members would be the ones that made it, being able to think of better ways to get food, impressing females more than their piers.
If toothed whales were first they were hunters and intelligence is always beneficial for hunters, tough times would mean small numbers with only the brainy being able to survive.
So you can see how they would get more intelligent over time. Eventually whales developed baleen(I hope, or my theories a load of bs) learning to feed on plankton which was more than plentiful. They got on easy street and joined the mindless plankton eaters. Plankton eaters who evolved eating plankton and so needed no great wit, but the whales history was more complex, it used to need its brain but now it doesn't, it just enjoys it, dreaming and telling stories and singing songs etc.
Sounds like someone we know....
humans don't need their massive brain for survival right now. So what must our history have really been like to develop it? Now all apes are pretty smart because physically they aren't as equipped as say... a lion. They have brains suitable for their needs. But what needs must we used to have had to develop a brain even bigger than theirs?
The aquatic ape theory is good for this reason I believe.
The ocean is a harsh mistress as they say. Its inhabitants can move easily when weather goes awry and this leaves a land animal relying on the ocean for food, up shit creek. I think our ancestors must have experienced some very hard times where only the intelligent made it through.
Like the baleen whales we found a backroad to easy street and now we have this big mass of unnecassarry brain left over.
Make sense?
Anyone think this is not the case?
If so, how can you deny the facts?
Polar bears basically are a marine mammal or are at least at the stage of turning into one. They swim for miles in the open ocean and hunt other marine mammals. They happen to be the most intelligent in the bear family. I can see how this is required. They need alot of brains to locate and sneak up on seal colonies resting on remote ice bergs. Other bears have it easy in comparison.
But what about whales? Do they really need all that intelligence? In particular baleen whales, all they really need to do is swim around with their mouths open. They have alot of left over brain power that is not required for their survival, this can be seen by the way they have made up dances and songs.
Now this is something I can't wait to have answered, which came first? Toothed whales or baleen?
If, as I suspect, the answer is toothed whales than I think that explains the left over intelligence of the baleens and I think it might give indications of how humans could have ended up with "too much" intelligence.
The transition from land to water was a big ask for the whales ancestors and they would have faced lots of trying times. Alot like the polar bear. The most intelligent members would be the ones that made it, being able to think of better ways to get food, impressing females more than their piers.
If toothed whales were first they were hunters and intelligence is always beneficial for hunters, tough times would mean small numbers with only the brainy being able to survive.
So you can see how they would get more intelligent over time. Eventually whales developed baleen(I hope, or my theories a load of bs) learning to feed on plankton which was more than plentiful. They got on easy street and joined the mindless plankton eaters. Plankton eaters who evolved eating plankton and so needed no great wit, but the whales history was more complex, it used to need its brain but now it doesn't, it just enjoys it, dreaming and telling stories and singing songs etc.
Sounds like someone we know....
humans don't need their massive brain for survival right now. So what must our history have really been like to develop it? Now all apes are pretty smart because physically they aren't as equipped as say... a lion. They have brains suitable for their needs. But what needs must we used to have had to develop a brain even bigger than theirs?
The aquatic ape theory is good for this reason I believe.
The ocean is a harsh mistress as they say. Its inhabitants can move easily when weather goes awry and this leaves a land animal relying on the ocean for food, up shit creek. I think our ancestors must have experienced some very hard times where only the intelligent made it through.
Like the baleen whales we found a backroad to easy street and now we have this big mass of unnecassarry brain left over.
Make sense?