Please do. Please explain how "nothingness" can impose a gravity field.
You are the TOE Chef, I am only a customer that said your food tasted bad. Now you (the Chef) exclaim, "you don't like my cooking, then let's see how skilled you are in the kitchen." Being the despicable person that I am, I accept your challenge because anybody can cook better than you.
Nothingness does not create a gravitational field. Where ever there is gravity we see mass. Accepted theory says energy can also create gravity but the effect is more pronounced for matter because matter is very dense energy. The geometry of the nothingness of space obviously plays a part. Its all right there in the recipe for gravity. That is about as far as I am going to go. I serve my pasta dish al dente with a side of uncooked veggies on a paper plate. Bon appetit.
But let's look at your theory. Or as I understand it, since you never quite get around to explicitly explaining it. Mass (such as a star) shifts the frequency of photons through the magic of "aether frequency waves". I love how you specify these waves as being 'frequency waves'. Anyway, the shifting of the photons generates the gravity effect through the magic of aether frequency waves. Your experiment just cuts out the middleman, actually the source, and shifts (a simulated shift) the photons directly. Because your photons are in a beam, the gravity itself will be in a beam. I try to imagine what this beam is like. If we consider gravity to be like a topological map, it raises some questions. Because the beam is narrow and long, the gradient would have to be steepest through the narrow direction. Like a 'V' or more likely a 'U' groove. You don't explain it so I assume the bottom of the trench through the long direction is steadily growing deeper so that the deepest point is at the far end. Perhaps it has a discontinuity that ripples through the beam where the flyback effect occurs. You never say. I assume the beam comes to an end where you detect the gravity, where the beam hits your postal scale. So it is at the end of the beam that the gravity should be strongest. I have no idea what would be the explanation if the beam direction was into "empty space". Now I fully expect you to say that is not how it works. You might go for the graviton explanation of gravity since that could be more beam-like when drawn on paper. A beam of gravitons. But knowing you all bets are off and there will be some magical "non-linear logic" involved. I had to take a stab at a description, you never have. You have never explained any of this and I would expect it to be pretty damn important to both your theory and your experiment. I suspect that you have never even considered any of this. The space alien probably didn't think it was that important to mention.
Last edited: