Meantime said:The test proves that God didn't, or wouldn't, or couldn't, or isn't.
Meantime said:Hence you couldn't be bothered.
Jenyar said:Not really following you. Don't we have a responsibility to warn people against their own stupidity?
water said:Eh? How do you know when someone is being stupid?
Maybe they are just bold, or have some particular insight, or ...
Jenyar said:Yep, he just proved that his god didn't exist, or perhaps just confirmed what Jesus told Satan: that we mustn't put God to the test...
The ending of Mark also stated: "20 Then the disciples went out and preached everywhere, and the Lord worked with them and confirmed his word by the signs that accompanied it."
So the signs did accompany those who believed. But it didn't replace the warning Jesus gave. If this man knew the history he might have learned from a few early Darwin Award nominees who made the same mistake:
1 Cor. 10:5-9 Nevertheless, God was not pleased with most of them; their bodies were scattered over the desert. Now these things occurred as examples to keep us from setting our hearts on evil things as they did. ... We should not test the Lord, as some of them did—and were killed by snakes.
Jenyar said:Not really following you. Don't we have a responsibility to warn people against their own stupidity?
Do you, can you, take the rest of actuality into account also?M: I mean, the scope of a living detailed circumstance, the very components that interlink experience with personal and impersonal phenomena which in turn respond, consciously or not, to one's dynamic environment, an environment which is dependent or interdependent or not dependent at all on many more factors.
That's because there's a difference between a sign (which you have no control over) and an ability (which you can exercise and "test").charles cure said:don't you find it sort of funny that jesus apparently says at the end of mark - "these are the signs that accompany believers", but then somewhere else says "don't try to test this, because you'll end up dead." that doesn't make sense, why tell believers that they will have these abilities, and then tell them not to use them, or even try to find out if they have them. thats ridiculous and awful.
Exodus 23:9, Lev. 19:34, Deut. 10:19 - all say the same thing: "you are to love those who are aliens, for you yourselves were aliens in Egypt." I'm not sure what passage you're referring to? (edit: 1 Corinthians 10 is in the New Testament, so I presume you mean the event the passage refers to?).in addition to that, the passage you quote is from the Old Testament, which i have come to see is apparently not as credible in the eyes of christians as the new testament is. if it were, we'd have people killing non-believers like deuteronomy says to. cherry pick all you like, the bible is useless.
Jenyar said:That's because there's a difference between a sign (which you have no control over) and a gift (which you can exercise and "test").
Exodus 23:9, Lev. 19:34, Deut. 10:19 - all say the same thing: "you are to love those who are aliens, for you yourselves were aliens in Egypt." I'm not sure what passage you're referring to? (edit: 1 Corinthians 10 is in the New Testament, so I presume you mean the event the passage refers to?).
Gordon said:There is no scriptural support for the assertion that persons who commit suicide go to hell.
c7ityi_ said:in the gospel of thomas jesus says: "Blessed is the lion which the man eats, and the lion will become man; and cursed is the man whom the lion eats, and the lion will become man.
though another translation says "and cursed is the man whom a lion eats so that the man becomes a lion!"
there is: "thou shalt not kill!"
No, in this case it's just the difference between the word "sign" and the word "ability", or gifts - there are plenty of other places where believers' gifts are outlined, and they don't include protection from danger. Seems straightforward enough to me.charles cure said:how convenient. are you sure that the word sign is really the word sign? or was it just another one of those instances where we translated idiomatic hebrew into overly literal greek?
your passage was indeed in the NT.
however, the passage from deutoronomy that i'm referring to that you don't know about is as follows:
Deu. 13:6-10
Jenyar said:Yep, he just proved that his god didn't exist, or perhaps just confirmed what Jesus told Satan: that we mustn't put God to the test...
Jenyar said:A man shouting that God would keep him safe was mauled to death by a lioness in Kiev zoo after he crept into the animal's enclosure ... an "animal island" protected by thick concrete blocks.You're right, this man was a brave, misunderstood genius...
Jenyar said:No, in this case it's just the difference between the word "sign" and the word "ability", or gifts - there are plenty of other places where believers' gifts are outlined, and they don't include protection from danger. Seems straightforward enough to me.
"If thy brother, the son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter, or the wife of thy bosom, or thy friend, which [is] as thine own soul, entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers ... thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die; because he hath sought to thrust thee away from the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage."The reason here is obviously that they "entice thee secretly" and "sought to thrust thee away from the LORD" - not that they believe differently or are non-believers, as you said. And as you can see, it pertains to the Israelites themselves.