Who are you or anyone to judge.
i was just pointing out that calling someone stupid when they don't understand you might imply that you don't recognize that give and take.
i think the username refers to what is the ideal union object (object is the wrong word here) of the gnosis experience. i don't know if they believe they always get to be like the thing they gnosisize (gnosisate?) with.
Then again, according to your reasoning on believers, the user should just use "decent I am", so as a human it wouldn't be wrong to claim belief.
i meant the give and take of the posting leading up to the calling someone stupid.There is no give and take in that.
It is give.RegardsDL
anyway, would another gnostic say YOU were deluded if you disagreed with that person, or just say , "that is your world, this is my world". Reminds me of the joke about the two solipsists that are mad at each other when they meet because they say "i am the only solipsist in the world." But seriously, i am interested in the gnostic ideas. I was reading an interesting book saying the term "gnosticism" is bad because people use it to describe various traditions that disagree with each other. I don't know, maybe marcion and valentinius came up, i can't remember it all.
Saying you are the only person that can talk about the God you know makes sense in a sense. What if some gnostic thinks God was telling him to kill people? Also, you being the highest being in your world doesn't make you god, unless you are saying we are all our own gods, in which case you may as well say we are all our own chickens or just our own humans.
This is the main issue i have with new age stuff - saying everything is god, no distinction between the stick and the human and the dog and the metaphysical superpower you say doesn't exist, is basically the same as saying nothing.
i meant the give and take of the posting leading up to the calling someone stupid.
anyway, would another gnostic say YOU were deluded if you disagreed with that person, or just say , "that is your world, this is my world". Reminds me of the joke about the two solipsists that are mad at each other when they meet because they say "i am the only solipsist in the world." But seriously, i am interested in the gnostic ideas. I was reading an interesting book saying the term "gnosticism" is bad because people use it to describe various traditions that disagree with each other. I don't know, maybe marcion and valentinius came up, i can't remember it all.
Saying you are the only person that can talk about the God you know makes sense in a sense. What if some gnostic thinks God was telling him to kill people? Also, you being the highest being in your world doesn't make you god, unless you are saying we are all our own gods, in which case you may as well say we are all our own chickens or just our own humans. This is the main issue i have with new age stuff - saying everything is god, no distinction between the stick and the human and the dog and the metaphysical superpower you say doesn't exist, is basically the same as saying nothing.
Who are you to judge that I cannot?
Let me add something I am working on.
Give your thoughts on it if you like.
Only I can judge God.
Repeat after me please. Only I can judge God.
DL
It is indeed strange to me when someone seems like they say "this is it, I learned x, or feel x now, i have no where else to go." I would imagine just continuing onward from any point would be a great journey or learning experience, whatever it should be called.The tie that binds all Gnostic I think is the fact that they work with facts and not faith and are perpetual seekers. Even those like me who found. If I would have kept what I found as an ideal then I would be idol worshipping worse that the foolish Christians who idol worship their Godinabook.
I may. You can judge whoever you please because I have judged you to do so. I have been judged by God to do so.
Walk with me, and I'll show you God. Great patience.
It is indeed strange to me when someone seems like they say "this is it, I learned x, or feel x now, i have no where else to go." I would imagine just continuing onward from any point would be a great journey or learning experience, whatever it should be called.
I am still not sure how you deal with the solipsist dilemma. I am not saying you are a pure solipsist, because that would seem to be a difficult position, and that whatever it is you are talking about is not explained by the term solipsism. But my limited understanding of your idea contains the problem. I don't know what "God W's IP" means. God worlds in particular? if so what does that mean. It is ok to drop if it too complicated to explain here.
No thanks.
I have morals and will not embrace human sacrifice or a God who thinks it just to punish the innocent instead of the guilty.
Regards
DL
You’re giving up your individuality, rationality, skepticism, and simply become a passive sheeperson a combination of a sheep and person. It’s not a real word but I find it quite adequate for describing what you’re trying to turn Greatest I Am or anyone else into. Plus you're surrendering your own free-will to an outside force to run your life...that's rather infantile to have to rely on fairy-tales to as a existential validation for as far as the universes is concerned(I know that this is personification but just deal with it) is rather insignificant existence in comparison to the micro and macro universes. What basically says to me is “Oh I’m too insecure to guide my own actions so I’ll just rely on my imaginary friend for spiritual guidance and consolidation instead of myself or other real people around me, Thanks god for validating my life so I don’t have to think or put any effort into that. You’re just great”What have we sacrificed? The Passive one is with God forever more by no means of sacrifice, giving something up!
No sacrifice, no surrender!
What have we sacrificed? The Passive one is with God forever more by no means of sacrifice, giving something up!
No sacrifice, no surrender!
You’re giving up your individuality, rationality, skepticism, and simply become a passive sheeperson a combination of a sheep and person. It’s not a real word but I find it quite adequate for describing what you’re trying to turn Greatest I Am or anyone else into. Plus you're surrendering your own free-will to an outside force to run your life...that's rather infantile to have to rely on fairy-tales to as a existential validation for as far as the universes is concerned(I know that this is personification but just deal with it) is rather insignificant existence in comparison to the micro and macro universes. What basically says to me is “Oh I’m too insecure to guide my own actions so I’ll just rely on my imaginary friend for spiritual guidance and consolidation instead of myself or other real people around me, Thanks god for validating my life so I don’t have to think or put any effort into that. You’re just great”
If you think of all the serial killers, sex fiends, murderers etc. they all came from one race that was created by one God. God can be a serial killer, a sex fiend ANYTHING because He created everything. He isn't the one being judged though, based on His own actions, who would judge Him(apart from little green men that own the multi dimensional multi verse)?.
God is your worst nightmare and your best friend.
He is being judged.
Judged as good by his followers and judged as evil by those whose judgement is not hampered of distorted by faith.
Somehow, those that judge him good, tell others that with our poor intellect, we are not fit to judge God.
Hence, I present these quotes and all must choose which ones to follow.
“Faith must trample under foot all reason, sense, and understanding.”
“Reason is a whore, the greatest enemy that faith has.”
Martin Luther
Galileo -- "I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use."
“Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities” – Voltaire
Regards
DL
No idea what your saying, where are you from out of interest?