Sometimes the seeming "profoundness" of an argument, makes the argument so much more arguable. Especially in this case... Of course, how profound or not makes a single bit of difference, that is not really any at all. Just because we like to proclaim atheism, it does not mean that atheism is so profound that it can wash away all of theism, and all of belief in a soul, without of course first discussing what a soul is. Destroy the concept of soul and all the beliefs talked about it, and you of course destroy the very foundation for that which is believed. You cannot do this, without first being naive or ridiculous. Of course the soul exists, we haven't even begin to discuss it. We can dismiss it for eternity, and that is probably in this case one of the better of the approaches, but we can't forget what we're dismissing. Otherwise, we're like Santa Clause not handing out presents to the people who need them.
That isn't to say that there isn't a concept or idea or reason for belief in soul. Belief in soul/afterlife/etc, is simply a belief in what is most rational. Therefore, our debates will not reach beyond closed mindedness without first discussing the truth. Good post fraggle rocker, but you are way very atheist lmao~
That isn't to say that there isn't a concept or idea or reason for belief in soul. Belief in soul/afterlife/etc, is simply a belief in what is most rational. Therefore, our debates will not reach beyond closed mindedness without first discussing the truth. Good post fraggle rocker, but you are way very atheist lmao~