No, you are the perversion bm.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Labor party and gay marriage
- Thread starter Asguard
- Start date
No, you are the perversion bm.
No, you are the perversion bm.
Well, that certainly added important contributions to the discussion. Thank you for your contribution. Please stop by again when you have more such important information to share with us.
Baron Max
barron, no actually its not. name one non sexual thing which is illegal only because of the "yuck" factor. only conservitives belive that the yuck factor is enough reason. my personal opinion is that alone shows there lack of intelligence and education.
Hmm, in a democracy or even a representative republic, all of that depends on the number of citizens/voters who feel the "yuk factor". See? In a society, there are many ways of making laws and rules. One of those methods is to determine if enough citizens feel "yukky" about something. If they do, then it's perfectly acceptable to make it illegal.
Or don't y'all believe in the ideals of voting??
Baron Max
Aw Fuck!
Baron stands in the ugly truth of democracy that adheres to the fact that despite humanity reaching the pinnacle of learning in the universe as we know it, we will always be dragged down to the disgusting base level of pathetic ignorance based fear and loathing courtesy of the power of the mindless, gormless masses.
Baron Max, you're a very scary dude, just smart enough to sound intelligent to the afforementioned clusterfuck and so fucking stupid that you don't have the nouse to know when you are spouting noxious crap through the tiny embrasure of your tinny trumpet arse.
Hail democracy, we're all doomed!
Yes, yes, hear the sarcastic platitudes as the applause your wizened alpha mindset is used to hearing and ignore the subtler reality of the truth belting you across your thick waterlogged football skull.
Have a nice day.
barron, no actually its not. name one non sexual thing which is illegal only because of the "yuck" factor. ...
Public drunkeness? Public nudity? Urinating in public? ....
But that's beside the point, I think. It's obvious that some voters are going to vote according to how they feel about things/issues. If you doubt that, then I don't know what to say to you.
Question, Asquard: How do you think people decide to vote on issues? Do you feel that they don't use any emotions at all, and only vote based on pure reasoning and logic?
only conservitives belive that the yuck factor is enough reason. my personal opinion is that alone shows there lack of intelligence and education.
Yeah, liberals never feel yukky about anything, right?
I think it's interesting, however, that you (and many people) make the "conservative-liberal" argument as if all liberals are exactly alike, and all conservatives are exactly alike. That they all have the same feelings and thoughts about each and every issue. It's just not true.
Baron Max
wether right or wrong public drunkness is about public saftey, urination is about public health. sadly i agree with you about nudity laws which is why they should be struck down
on the C v L issue it doesnt matter what they call themselves, all thst matters is how they act
on the C v L issue it doesnt matter what they call themselves, all thst matters is how they act
wether right or wrong public drunkness is about public saftey, urination is about public health. sadly i agree with you about nudity laws which is why they should be struck down ...
So you think a society should allow it's members to do anything that they want to do as long as it doesn't "harm" another person? Anything? Fucking in public? ...in front of children? Cursing in public? ...in front of children?
Can you imagine, Asquard, a society that would allow anything and everything like you've mentioned? ...anything that people want to do? ...and you'd like such a society? Are you sure that you're not dreaming of an ideal, a Shangri-La? ...of something that could never, ever exist with humans?
Baron Max
I'm gonna wade in here with my Alaskan trout fishing gumboots on( lest baron chunders all over me,[well known for his lack of fortitude in the queasiness stakes is our baron]).
baron, HARDEN THE FUCK UP!!, public drunkenness...ya killen me!
Public nudity,..shit I've never seen a saggy set of nuts before, let alone an unencumbered muff ( run for the hills, society has lost all sense of decency)
* Pause to comment* Baron max appears to have lived fifty odd years without having to address cetain factors which occur in non-Victorian England such as farting, wiping one's own clacker or accepting that nipples may spontaneously become erect.
Baron is clearly much more at home shooting an errant dog through its cranium or lopping the scone off a feathered farmyard friend, wapping some cold lead into the soft neck of a wild buck ( NOW wer're talikin')..Go baron, you great Klutz....
Best I shut-up now before some weedy mod takes offence on your behalf.
baron, HARDEN THE FUCK UP!!, public drunkenness...ya killen me!
Public nudity,..shit I've never seen a saggy set of nuts before, let alone an unencumbered muff ( run for the hills, society has lost all sense of decency)
* Pause to comment* Baron max appears to have lived fifty odd years without having to address cetain factors which occur in non-Victorian England such as farting, wiping one's own clacker or accepting that nipples may spontaneously become erect.
Baron is clearly much more at home shooting an errant dog through its cranium or lopping the scone off a feathered farmyard friend, wapping some cold lead into the soft neck of a wild buck ( NOW wer're talikin')..Go baron, you great Klutz....
Best I shut-up now before some weedy mod takes offence on your behalf.
barron
YES, anything for which a reason to forbid cant be scientifically proven should be alowed
as for public sex, seriously grow up. lots of kids walk in on ghere parents or siblings each year. never herd one case of it causing the child any harm. there for yes it should be legal
YES, anything for which a reason to forbid cant be scientifically proven should be alowed
as for public sex, seriously grow up. lots of kids walk in on ghere parents or siblings each year. never herd one case of it causing the child any harm. there for yes it should be legal
Actually yes you are. You are accusing homosexuals of ritual pollution of marriage. Face it. You think they are unclean.
That's a load of crap and you know. Your real objection it gays are unclean and you preffer them to be oppressed as punishment.
You could at least stop lying.
i think your a twonk, and cannot handle other peoples opinions, i am not lying when i say that i ahve nothing against homosexuals, its just that i PERSONALLY do not think they should get married, i dont think they're unclean in ANY WAY, i just think you cant handle opposing arguements
Why do you think homosexuality goes against marriage? Why do you think they shouldn't be able to adopt? What does procreation have to do with marriage?
Norsefire: What?
right ok....marriage in the eyes of most churches (apart from the quakers) is for hetroseuxal couples, i dont think they should be able to adopt because (i may be old fashioned here) children need a mother and a father, not two dads or two mums, and it is (normally) better fro children to be born into a relationship with a mum and dad
LA, i like you but your wrong. you havent provided an argument. all you have said is you dont like it, the NAZIs had better arguments for killing the jews, the slave owners had better arguments for oposing lincon
i like you to...however...you cant voice an opinion and then complain when someone disagrees with you, likewise you cannot tell the other person you are wrong.
i think its a blight on hetrosexual mariages, marriage is for a man and woman, not two men or two women, i may be old fashioned but that is just MY opinion
Oh ok; too bad our democracies today border socialismLiberal Democracy is a phrase often used to describe Western democratic political systems, such as Australia, the United States, Britain, New Zealand, Canada and other nations. It refers to political systems in which there are attempts to:
Lib'rals think their ridiculous programs that I don't agree with are enough reason to take my money. Liberals are no better, they just strip you of your hard earned moneybarron, no actually its not. name one non sexual thing which is illegal only because of the "yuck" factor. only conservitives belive that the yuck factor is enough reason. my personal opinion is that alone shows there lack of intelligence and education.
Also this kind of opinion on 'gay marriage' doesn't need 'logic and reason'. It's almost entirely emotional. I can understand LA's point of view.
what most grinds me is the fact that our children are taught in schools that homosexuality is a perfectly normal way to live, when in fact children should be allowed to judge for themselves what is right for them, personally i have a bi sexual son and that doesnt bother me, its the fact that schools are promoting it has a good way of life
what most grinds me is the fact that our children are taught in schools that homosexuality is a perfectly normal way to live, when in fact children should be allowed to judge for themselves what is right for them, personally i have a bi sexual son and that doesnt bother me, its the fact that schools are promoting it has a good way of life
You surprise me for being British, but I agree.
You surprise me for being British, but I agree.
why do i surprise you for being british?
Are you serious or just kidding ?! .:shrug: .barron
YES, anything for which a reason to forbid cant be scientifically proven should be alowed
as for public sex, seriously grow up. lots of kids walk in on ghere parents or siblings each year. never herd one case of it causing the child any harm. there for yes it should be legal
why do i surprise you for being british?
Most British people are liberal pansies
At least here