Or do you mean "It has rephrased questions that originally weren't posed as scientific questions"?
Multi-universe and other dimensions are theories within physics which stem from religions; realms of heaven, earth and Hades were separate. The gods of mythology could transport into our dimension, according to ancient theories. Originally, modern science, at the age of enlightenment was only concerned with the physical or earth realm and not all the other dimensions that had been speculated to exist at that time, that allow spontaneous generation. This was recycled and is called science, now.
Chaos and random theory also recycles from the past. From the middle ages, back in time, the gods were not considered predictable, rather humans were subject to the whims of the gods. The age of reason and enlightenment, which modernized science, assumed there was no whim of the gods, but rather we lived in a world of cause and effect subject to reason and logic. The whim of the gods was recycled in the early 20th century, with the lord of chaos resurrected. The main difference was mythology broke down chaos into a range of characters, while science is lumps this into one abstract character; monotheism. One might assume the next logical progression will differentiate chaos.
An interesting effect of old, which still exists today, can be seen with an example. When astronomy was called astrology, the scientists of the day were still able to plot the paths of planets and stars with excellent accuracy, based on the tools they had. The question is how could they collect data and make accurate plots, while still having weak theory? These are two separate things, that can be made to overlap subjectively by traditions and conventions.
One can collect good data, but the explanation may not be as good as the data collection, but through social subjectivity and other prestige effects, is can be accepted as connected. The theory of multi-universes is not supported by hard and direct data and therefore exists apart from data. Collecting data to prove this is sort of self serving with engineering contrivance needed to complete the magic trick. The magician can contrive an experimental test; saw the assistant in half, that the audience can verify.
Another way to make this subjective bridge, apart from contrivance, is connected to math. Math can model anything, including fantasy. Modern physics game engines, can assume any properties of materials and forces of nature and allow dynamic simulations. If we play the game, based on math, we can fly and change into other materials or move in and out of multi-universes. We can even tweak chaos, itself, so this god become more or less predictable. One has to be careful since how can you factor this out when theory is math driven?