James R's Independent Review Process
- Thread starter Gustav
- Start date
- Status
Are you sure all you said was:
"mmph
trippy playing the innocent"?
And what were you doing with a bee?
(mentioned by superstring when banning you)
If you were being cruel to it, you deserved the ban.
First off he didn't ask, he demanded, actually he made a statement:
"you will now demonstrate my intellectual dishonesty."
Then he complained about the fact that I hadn't responded in a thread that has subsequently locked.
He complained about the fact that I hadn't replied, even though I had subsequently been online - apparently he is of the opinion that replying to him should have been the first, and single thing that I did. He PM'd me at 2.30pm on the 29th, and was complaining about it on 10am on the 30th (local time).
I pointed out to him that he had made a statement, not asked a question (if he can't be bothered to use proper punctuation and grammar, that's his lookout), and also pointed out that I thought I had made my position on the matter perfectly clear in the thread in question.
He responded by reproducing the PM in full, linking to the thread in question, and complaining that I had not demonstrated anything in the thread.
To which I naturally responded by first illustrating how the full text of the PM only supported my assertions, that he made a statement, rather than a request, and pointing out that I hadn't actually claimed to have proven anything, only that I had made my position on the matter clear (the implication of which is that somebody else made a post which I considered a sufficient demonstration to take action on, and had at least alluded to that in the thread in question). I then pointed out that strictly speaking the discussion between leopold and myself was off topic, and suggested that Tiassa might want to split it off into its own thread.
At which point leopold asserted that he had asked me twice to explain myself, complained that I hadn't, and suggested that things would be different if I were held accountable for my actions.
The threads in question are:
weather control
And:
Thread and posts disappearing
if your ego wants to interpret that statement that way then go for it.
i fail to find the word "demand" in the above statement.
uh, how does one reply to a locked thread trippy?
after the thread was locked i never mentioned anything else about this.
i want james and plasma both to read this quote of yours trippy, then i hope they fire you for it.
yes, quite right. you also stated you don't remember demonstrating my intellectual dishonesty in that thread.
another load of BS. i stated i didn't see where you demonstrated my ID and you stated you didn't demonstrate it.
this makes the third attempt by me to get a demonstration of my "illegality".
gee gustav i'm sorry i interrupted the little jerk you got going on with james.
well then, lets have james take a shot at this then.
sorry james, gustav forced the situation.
Having the word 'demand' in the statement is not a pre-requisite for it to be considered one. If you recall, I originally said that it was a statement that was contextually a demand, either way it is still not a request.
That's not what the statement:
means, leopold.
sub·se·quentAdjective/ˈsəbsəkwənt/
1. Coming after something in time; following.
In otherwords "Then he complained about the fact that I hadn't responded in a thread that was locked after he posted."
So you think that your use of grammar and punctuation is at least reasonable, do you?
No, that's not what I actually said.
Here's what I actually said:
In other words, I don't recall claiming that I had demonstrated your intellectual dishonesty in that thread, the only claim I made was the same thing I have reiterated here, that is that I felt it had been adequately demonstrated in the thread.
No, it is a precise and accurate summation of the events between yourself and myself in the thread the Varda started. And again, you miss the crucial point in amongst all of this, I also stated that I felt it had been adequately demonstrated
Strictly speaking it represents your second complaint about my lack of response to your PM.
In this case, as is often the case (for me at least) the ban (seriously, how many bands have I ever handed out?) wasn't just about a single post, there is no single post of Leopolds that I can point to and say "this is what he was banned for", on the other hand, as I have suggested several times now, it has, none the less, been (I feel) adequately demonstrated within the thread.
I wasn't particularly planning on it, I feel I've said all I need to say, and leopold has yet to come up with what I would consider to be a compelling demonstration of why I should say more than I have.
because you have NEVER demonstrated my intellectual dishonesty trippy.
in case you need help with the definition:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_dishonesty
the thread where my alleged intellectual dishonesty occurred:
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=109508
oh, BTW:
Quote me, just once, claiming I had?
The only thing I have claimed is that it has been demonstrated.
that's my point.
and for the 4th or 5th time WHERE?
this is over the fucking top bullshit.
@ James. The idea behind this thread is good, which you have affirmed by your posting on it.
But it needs a few rules.
Otherwise people will keep posting the same old bones of contention till everyone is sick of reading them.
@Gustav. It's your thread. Do you think any rules should be introduced, or should things be left as they are?
But it needs a few rules.
Otherwise people will keep posting the same old bones of contention till everyone is sick of reading them.
@Gustav. It's your thread. Do you think any rules should be introduced, or should things be left as they are?
Last edited:
Well, that killed that thread.
It's worse than that he's dead Jim,
Dead Jim,
Dead Jim,
It's worse than that he's Dead Jim,
Dead Jim,
DEAD!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCARADb9asE
What this forum needs, if I may be a bit presumptuous, is more blandness and mediocrity. Someone who reflect the common man in both mind and form.
You know, someone who repeats the modern myths in exactly the right tone of voice, and who has the appearance of a woman morphing into a man, and the psychology to prove it.
Censorship has been used in every era by sexually repressed brainless twits since the beginning of history. each claimed to be current and in touch with reality and each had that dull character of an accountant.
That safe environment bred boredom should not surprise anyone who understand the world.
But that in that sheltering dullness the least interesting should find a place in positions of administrative authority only a few can fully grasp.
Consider this forum a microcosm of a macrocosm.
Same fertilizer.
You know, someone who repeats the modern myths in exactly the right tone of voice, and who has the appearance of a woman morphing into a man, and the psychology to prove it.
Censorship has been used in every era by sexually repressed brainless twits since the beginning of history. each claimed to be current and in touch with reality and each had that dull character of an accountant.
That safe environment bred boredom should not surprise anyone who understand the world.
But that in that sheltering dullness the least interesting should find a place in positions of administrative authority only a few can fully grasp.
Consider this forum a microcosm of a macrocosm.
Same fertilizer.
Bells
Staff member
If you're so uncommon, why do you keep coming back? As the superman that you so obviously are, you really ought to create your own superforum or something. Oh wait - you've tried that, haven't you? How is it working out for you? Any members other than yourself?
it appears james r wants to review a post authored almost a year ago by me
naturally i had no idea what it meant so i had to look it up again
i found a translation here
according to the website "gaand chaat mera, lund chuse" means "kiss my ass, cocksucker"
the person i was addressing, indiancurry2010, has been inactive since.......
....5-10-11 and the last post in that thread occured on 04-16-11, 09:22 AM so i wonder who complained. james?? is your grudge that all- consuming that you have to go back almost a year, to a response towards an inactive poster in order to fuck with me? really?
you need help.
why a 3 day ban? learn your own goddamn hindi
oh
you defend the curry freak because you share similar sentiments? you are bigoted towards the chinese? my chinese heritage?
perhaps you had one too many drinks and are sloshed out of your mind?
/snicker
James R said:
naturally i had no idea what it meant so i had to look it up again
i found a translation here
according to the website "gaand chaat mera, lund chuse" means "kiss my ass, cocksucker"
the person i was addressing, indiancurry2010, has been inactive since.......
....5-10-11 and the last post in that thread occured on 04-16-11, 09:22 AM so i wonder who complained. james?? is your grudge that all- consuming that you have to go back almost a year, to a response towards an inactive poster in order to fuck with me? really?
you need help.
why a 3 day ban? learn your own goddamn hindi
oh
you defend the curry freak because you share similar sentiments? you are bigoted towards the chinese? my chinese heritage?
perhaps you had one too many drinks and are sloshed out of your mind?
/snicker
Last edited:
- Status