Yea so nothing will be killed.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Is testing on animals OK or NOT?
- Thread starter clayton
- Start date
Yea so nothing will be killed.
Didn't I just mention that there are alternatives? For cosmetics we've got Yves Rocher, Weleda, Body Shop, etc.Do you use Shampoo?
Dishwashing liquid?
Bathroom bleach?
How about Laundry powder?
Ever used an insecticide, herbicide, fungicide or fertilizer in the garden?
Do you drive?
Have you ever used a Sharpee?
How about a hand sanitizer, or liquid soap?
Bathroom bleach? How about vinegar?
Laundry powder, and liquid ones...
http://biokleenhome.com/
http://www.ecos.com/
http://www.methodhome.com/
http://www.seventhgeneration.com/
http://www.buyorganic.com.au/blog/index.php/2007/01/eco-laundry-powder/
A sharpee? I don't know what that is. Sorry.
Anyway, I can't say that I'm not guilty of having used products that were used on animals in the past, but I've become more conscious about the products I consume, and I'm trying to search for alternatives, and there are alternatives, and I'm making use of them.
I'm mainly against unnecessary animal testing such as for cosmetics.
They're already working on that, or actually have already some stuff developed...like I previously linked: http://altweb.jhsph.edu/Why not create a "Testing Being" neither human nor animal but will respond exactly as a human would to testing. And as far as test stuff on people goes they are more likely to give valuable data then a rabbit that cannot speak.