can you think for yourself.
can you think at all?
repeating my criticisms of you back to me doesn't make me think your very capable intellectually.
1- i'm not repeating your criticisms, i'm stating a fact: you have not actually produced any evidence other than your opinion
2- you are the one repeating, ad nauseum, the same unfounded opinion (delusion) while attempting to state this justifies your conclusions while not, i repeat,
NOT actually giving any evidence to justify your conclusions. basically you're saying that you're right becuase you say so and because you believe yourself to be right. just like any delusional cult member, religious fundamentalist, racist, sexists or similar pseudoscience crank
and thus the difference between us: i've provided links and references to prove your support of the
Tiassa statement to be wrong and that you're stupid and you've only demonstrated you are stupid by stating that i can't think for myself because i can provide evidence to prove you wrong
you really don't understand the argument do you? a simple syllogism chain is literally beyond your comprehension.
and you consider a hypothetical syllogism to be justification for your argument?
lets quote direct from the source since you can't comprehend the above and you are incapable of actually reading the link, the law or anything other than your biased echo chamber supporters: it doesn't matter if you consider a person a threat - however, once you utilise race as the justification of a person being a threat and therefore attempt to justify your defense or action against said person you become, quite literally, a criminal
let me show you:
Offenses involving actual or perceived race, color, religion, or national origin.—Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, willfully causes bodily injury to any person or, through the use of fire, a firearm, a dangerous weapon, or an explosive or incendiary device, attempts to cause bodily injury to any person, because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, or national origin of any person—
(A)shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years, fined in accordance with this title, or both; and
(B) shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined in accordance with this title, or both, if—
(i)death results from the offense; or
(ii)the offense includes kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill.
what that means in very small words for you: as i noted above, it's illegal to kill black people in the US
but more importantly, and specifically referring to the abjectly stupid comment of perceiving a threat because one was of a different race, it is illegal to use race as an excuse to justify your feeling threatened
and i've repeated this more than once
so lets use your "simple syllogism chain" so that perhaps you can comprehend this:
killing people is illegal
racial crimes are illegal
killing someone because of race is illegal
don't believe me, then actually read the law
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/249
the fact you even said that shows you don't understand the argument. its a chain. if the chain breaks at point A point D no longer matters.
stating this while not comprehending the law or being able to use a free resource to actually check your facts shows you don't understand the argument
only one delusional here is you. no you did to feel better about yourself. its merely pedantic and a tactic used by poor debaters when they have been beat.
you're repeating what i said...so i will repeat your own words: "can you think for yourself. repeating my criticisms of you back to me doesn't make me think your very capable intellectually." [sic]
No you defending a jack booted thug makes you defending a jack booted thug. also you being ok with people making death threats to promote a pro gun agenda makes you a proponent of pro gun terrorism.
troll/baiting comment not justified by evidence
care to provide the evidence for your belief on this?
i thought not... you can't even supply evidence for your delusional belief that it's legal to kill blacks in the US
your entire fucking argument was based on a subjective interpretation of events.
actually, my entire f*cking argument is based upon the law, as linked multiple times already
it's not my fault you can't f*cking read
deal with it, illiterati-troll
LMFAO
you mean your trying to denigrate based on your own failings
only if that is what you were trying to do... perhaps you should re-read that?
LMFAO
did you really just threaten me for insulting your manhood? your even more childish than i thought.
actually you are the one that made an implied threat, and i offered you a solution to exercise your threat
i can also provide you driving instructions should you decide to... oh wait. you can't read
sorry
I can also get out my crayons and draw you a map any 5 year old can use... or would you prefer i programmed it directly into google and just sent you the link?
also i abhor violence an it harm none do as ye will and all but as i thought you feel violence is an appropriate means of dealing with mockery ironic given your stated stance in this thread.
you made the threat mrs illiterati, not i
LMFAO
i said i remember posting history. i do not have an eidetic memory. ie i remember themes and patterns not every single fact.
and i just proved that to be factually incorrect
hell, you can't even grasp that i am not arguing from opinion, but actual written law, backed by the SCOTUS and precedent!
LOL
let me prove it to you with your very next regurgitated non-evidence based biased stupid comment
if your so much smarter than why can't you see it? oh thats right because your entire argument is based on your own biases and ignoring of historical fact
LOL
see?
it's not rocket surgery - you really can use those links to see where i cite the law, not my opinion!
oh wait... forgot who i was talking to
LMFAO
wait... WHAT?
ok, time to prove you're a blatant liar, troll and intentionally being stupid now
you said i issued a threat, and i can prove it:
but than again your one of aholes who thinks its ok to issue death threats to people for wanting gun control so yeah your a thug and i remember
so, please show where i issued a death threat to anyone, let alone to someone for wanting gun control
you will never be able to provide evidence supporting this because it doesn't exist. in any thread.
this makes you intentionally being a troll
provide the evidence mrs illiterati!
where is that evidence?
i can wait...
.
.
still nothing?
.
[crickets]
...yeah, that's what i thought!
you get one warning this is it. do not mention my mom again. you weren't here when that shitstorm went down and i am not the sort to hold things against people that they don't know about. you fucked up and crossed a line don't do it again.
that is called a threat, and can be utilised in a court of law to establish intent as well as a direct threat
if you can't actually provide the evidence then i suggest you STFU and go away
or report the posts and comments and allow a moderator to decide.
this will not go away now. you've threatened me, you've assaulted my manhood, you've lied, you've presented delusion and misrepresented the law, reality and intentionally (and blatantly) made false accusations all in this thread alone, all for a blatantly stupid purpose.
step carefully. and consider your words carefully, because this thread is now archived on more than one hard drive to insure clarity and the ability to provide evidence should the MODS decide to simply delete all posts from us both
i somehow doubt that. satire requires a better understanding of logic than you've shown. and i could give two shits what your wife thinks. if she agrees with you than she is just as ignorant as you.
attacking my wife because you're an idiot and can't read?
ROTFLMFAO
she laughed too! just FYI!
and now we see denigration of the mentally ill. that's ugly.
actually, i have
ample evidence in
this thread alone that you've ADD and a few other mental disorders, so that is not denigration
that is a
request to get back on your meds so that you can think clearly
