Who am I to argue against a Profet?
But I will do it anyway:
> Menstruation must offer some advantage for human survival or it would not have survived itself.
It isn't a logical argument. Menstruation is simple a byproduct, a sideeffect, and not a means itself. So her argument doesn't stand...
But I will do it anyway:
> Menstruation must offer some advantage for human survival or it would not have survived itself.
It isn't a logical argument. Menstruation is simple a byproduct, a sideeffect, and not a means itself. So her argument doesn't stand...