dealing with existence here is like this. it can be so unbelievably bad and atrocious, you feel as if you could pass out from incomprehension or going to have a brain anyeurism. otherwise, just eerily gutted in having to accept the awful abject truth.
i view the master's laugh as the demiurge the gnostics described as the god of this domain/universe that let's some good to fool overall that it's good when it's really not.
a wolf in sheep's clothing. not the true god but assumed to be based on localized power; no different than any dictator that brainwashes as well as have it's minions and victims in captivity.
but you see people sometimes question that obviously something is off or doesn't add up such as how can a god that purportedly love or care for us allow so much evil or be forced to exist in a predatorial system etc.
the setup is quite perverted too. you have a base/foundation of evil so that right there puts good on a more vulnerable footing and indicative that it's not on it's home turf. then some hope and good must exist in order to damage, betray or cause despair as well as it's really disheartening when good is exploited and it can even abjectly under these universal laws/conditions. that gives pleasure to evil as well as strokes it's ego.
to us, this universe is considered omnipotent or all there is and so would a power want to keep that belief or delusion going as well as justify it.
his near death experience mirrors the corruption behind nature and what many assume to be the real god is not the true god. he notes that the demiurge that has direct power over this universe and therefore assumed to be the true god is more patriarchal, immoral, cruel, megalomaniac etc whereas the actual true god is more a pure, gentle, fair and loving energy and beyond this scope etc.
he said the demiurge's main mission is to prove that evil is as superior or superior to good because that's what he is. i was like, wow, because that really resonates with what i've picked up about nature here in patterns and it really is as if that evil is very jealous of good and tries to either mimic it, overtake it, pervert it or destroy it.
you realize this dynamic (i think he said 2/3 light and 1/3 dark but i think more accurately that it's the other way around) because the world is always more troubled or has those more suffering than those who don't consistently overall) through life experience in that you always have to be aware of the bottomline, the dark or the worst case scenario which is usually pretty bad as in you can always count on bad here but good is often more vulnerable, ephemeral, sometimes seems even illusionary to trust. not that it inherently is but it can be used as bait and the fact that it's a part of existence, not foundational in this current formula/design. you can liken good as a guest, not the hometeam.
evil likes innocence to trust so it can betray and exploit. it is one of the most disgusting aspects of nature here.