Is becoming like God good or evil?

Greatest I am, what do you mean by 'evil'?

To me, the word has lost meaning.
Of course, in everyday life I can use it losely to mean some voluntary act that has deliberate harmful effects (or, rather: the intention of doing such an act).

Evil is different o each of us. Subjective.

What I think is evil, in terms of physical harm would not seem evil at all to an S & M for example.

Do unto others is a good center of the road motto.

This clip does show a rather good philosophy and I support it's views.
God would not as he breaks their first rule of morality but he is a prick anyway.

http://blog.ted.com/2008/09/17/the_real_differ/

Regards
DL
 
Where is the proof that the original idea of God was created by humans?

Is the absence of God or any tangible piece of evidence not a good indicator of that fact.

Those two facts are more facts than what is given by those who say God is real because a book tells us that he is.

Regards
DL
 
How can we have a discussion when we are not even clear about the subject? I am not interested in relativistic empty talk about evil being subjective; that is what I mean by 'it has lost its meaning"

Also, nobody will convince anybody on the matter of the existence or non-existence of God/ a god / gods. Such discussions are a waste of energy.

However, what or who is this Godhead you speak of? Never heard that one before.
 
How can we have a discussion when we are not even clear about the subject? I am not interested in relativistic empty talk about evil being subjective; that is what I mean by 'it has lost its meaning"

Also, nobody will convince anybody on the matter of the existence or non-existence of God/ a god / gods. Such discussions are a waste of energy.

However, what or who is this Godhead you speak of? Never heard that one before.

The Godhead I know in a nutshell.
I was a skeptic till the age of 39.
I then had an apotheosis and later branded myself a Gnostic Christian naturalist.
Gnostic Christian because I exemplify this quote from William Blake.

“Both read the Bible day and night, But thou read'st black where I read white.”

This refers to how Gnostics tend to reverse, for moral reasons, what Christians see in the Bible. We tend to recognize the evil ways of O T God where literal Christians will see God’s killing as good. Christians are sheeple where Gnostic Christians are goats.
This is perhaps why we see the use of a Jesus scapegoat as immoral, while theists like to make Jesus their beast of burden. An immoral position.

During my apotheosis, something that only lasted 5 or 6 seconds, the only things of note to happen was that my paradigm of reality was confirmed and I was chastised to think more demographically. What I found was what I call a cosmic consciousness. Not a new term but one that is a close but not exact fit.

I recognize that I have no proof. That is always the way with apotheosis.
This is also why I prefer to stick to issues of morality because no one has yet been able to prove that God is real and I have no more proof than they for the cosmic consciousness.

The cosmic consciousness is not a miracle working God. He does not interfere with us save when one of us finds it. Not a common thing from what I can see. It is a part of nature and our next evolutionary step.

I tend to have more in common with atheists who ignore what they see as my delusion because our morals are basically identical. Theist tend not to like me much as I have no respect for literalists and fundamentals and think that most Christians have tribal mentalities and poor morals.

I am rather between a rock and a hard place but this I cannot help.

I am happy to be questioned on what I believe but whether or not God exists is basically irrelevant to this world for all that he does not do, and I prefer to thrash out moral issues that can actually find an end point. The search for God is never ending when you are of the Gnostic persuasion. My apotheosis basically says that I am to discard whatever God I found, God as a set of rules that is, not idol worship it but instead, raise my bar and seek further.

My apotheosis also showed me that God has no need for love, adoration or obedience. He has no needs. Man has dominion here on earth and is to be and is the supreme being.

Regards
DL
 
How can we have a discussion when we are not even clear about the subject? I am not interested in relativistic empty talk about evil being subjective; that is what I mean by 'it has lost its meaning"

Also, nobody will convince anybody on the matter of the existence or non-existence of God/ a god / gods. Such discussions are a waste of energy.

However, what or who is this Godhead you speak of? Never heard that one before.

I agree that all discussions of God are speculative nonsense as he cannot be proven to exist. That is why I wanted to steer this discussions to the morality of the actions of God as depicted in scriptures.

Regards
DL
 
Back
Top