Today Cheney said that he will not rule out war with Iran, especially since they are getting disturbingly close to having nuclear weapons.
War may be effective, but I have an alternate idea, if they continue on their current path, rather than taking them to war, we should cut off supplies to that nation until they realize that there is nothing they can do but give up nuclear bomb manufacturing.
On the other hand, sieging a nation starves warmongers as well as its civilians. But sometimes I wonder, are the civilians in Iran as warmongering as their President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad? If they are, then I believe sieging them may be a good idea... honestly, they are a desert country, how long would they last under siege?
War may be effective, but I have an alternate idea, if they continue on their current path, rather than taking them to war, we should cut off supplies to that nation until they realize that there is nothing they can do but give up nuclear bomb manufacturing.
On the other hand, sieging a nation starves warmongers as well as its civilians. But sometimes I wonder, are the civilians in Iran as warmongering as their President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad? If they are, then I believe sieging them may be a good idea... honestly, they are a desert country, how long would they last under siege?