Note: I initially posted this in "pseudoscience". As such matters are usually not openly discussed in mainstream science forums. Although, I feel, this is very suitable for mainstream astronomy discussion.
Please do not mistake this for another thread, that has you gorging at rocks, to see anamolies. In fact, here, you will not have to gorge for hours on end, you will merely have to glance once.
I showed these images to some friends, including my mother, who have barely any knowledge of ETI and Mars. As soon as they glanced at the images, they instanty recognized them. I then told them, these images are from surface of Mars and they are only illusions of light and shadow and natural erosion and crater formation. The expressions on their face were almost as if I was telling them the sky is green; they simply could not accept, that what they just saw, was anything but artificial. In fact my mom went as far as saying, "whoever thinks this is, natural, needs their head checking" In fact, I do not disagree with them at all.
If these images are optical illusions, or just perceptions akin to ink-blot test, then why are they so well-defined, instantly recognizable, seemingly intelligently designed and very detailed. From a human perspective, they look as real as a cropcircles would look from a topological view. Yet, we know for a fact, that cropcircles are really there - not an illusion of light and shadow.
Yet it is also true, that we humans, try to seek order in everything we see. Even in complete chaos. Hence, why some of us can discern the face of Jesus in clouds etc. Yet, everytime this has happend, the supposed "face" is a very faint outline, and the rest of the details, we fill in ourselves. On the contarary, we've never seen a face formed by natural chaos, that is completely defined; every detail: eyes; chin, mouth, teeth, face structure, nose, nostrils, jaw; evenly proportioned, well defined and symmetrical - basically every primary and secondary facial feature.
If one studies terrestrial geology and satellite imagary of areas of natural geology, we could build up a geological and a visual vocabulary of natural occurring structures, with which, we can discern weather the structures on Mars, are natural, or artificial.
In fact as per the laws of probability based on the priori principle, the probability of a face forming completely out of chaos is 1 in 10^21 - basically, and it's an understatement; very unlikely. According to the same laws of probability - the probability of three such faces forming in the same place(Mars) would be 1 in 10^63 - which would not occurr according to Boel's law.
In other words, the probability of all 3 faces on Mars, forming completely by blind chance; is mathmatically impossible.
(Note, this image is often discounted as an optical illusion, however there is proof now, that this is not an optical illusion at all, and the images released in 98 were deliberaly flattened and unevenly lit to make it look less like a face)
Therefore, mathematically, there has been, OR still is, some form of ET intelligence on Mars.
Please do not mistake this for another thread, that has you gorging at rocks, to see anamolies. In fact, here, you will not have to gorge for hours on end, you will merely have to glance once.
I showed these images to some friends, including my mother, who have barely any knowledge of ETI and Mars. As soon as they glanced at the images, they instanty recognized them. I then told them, these images are from surface of Mars and they are only illusions of light and shadow and natural erosion and crater formation. The expressions on their face were almost as if I was telling them the sky is green; they simply could not accept, that what they just saw, was anything but artificial. In fact my mom went as far as saying, "whoever thinks this is, natural, needs their head checking" In fact, I do not disagree with them at all.
If these images are optical illusions, or just perceptions akin to ink-blot test, then why are they so well-defined, instantly recognizable, seemingly intelligently designed and very detailed. From a human perspective, they look as real as a cropcircles would look from a topological view. Yet, we know for a fact, that cropcircles are really there - not an illusion of light and shadow.
Yet it is also true, that we humans, try to seek order in everything we see. Even in complete chaos. Hence, why some of us can discern the face of Jesus in clouds etc. Yet, everytime this has happend, the supposed "face" is a very faint outline, and the rest of the details, we fill in ourselves. On the contarary, we've never seen a face formed by natural chaos, that is completely defined; every detail: eyes; chin, mouth, teeth, face structure, nose, nostrils, jaw; evenly proportioned, well defined and symmetrical - basically every primary and secondary facial feature.
If one studies terrestrial geology and satellite imagary of areas of natural geology, we could build up a geological and a visual vocabulary of natural occurring structures, with which, we can discern weather the structures on Mars, are natural, or artificial.
In fact as per the laws of probability based on the priori principle, the probability of a face forming completely out of chaos is 1 in 10^21 - basically, and it's an understatement; very unlikely. According to the same laws of probability - the probability of three such faces forming in the same place(Mars) would be 1 in 10^63 - which would not occurr according to Boel's law.
In other words, the probability of all 3 faces on Mars, forming completely by blind chance; is mathmatically impossible.
(Note, this image is often discounted as an optical illusion, however there is proof now, that this is not an optical illusion at all, and the images released in 98 were deliberaly flattened and unevenly lit to make it look less like a face)
Therefore, mathematically, there has been, OR still is, some form of ET intelligence on Mars.
Last edited: