Jolly Rodger said:
Bell I have been on more planes than you have had hot meals my friend!
My whole point was if she had other things in her bag besides the board it could way 13kg, when ever I fly I have to pay excess because my bags weigh to much, and I am always mystified due to the fact that may bag can sometimes be 10kg over or three kg over, it always feels the same to me.
I think you should get off your high horse buddy because it is you that can not know what you are talking about.
Because I am sure if you had three bags all of different weight and I got you to carry them 50meters and then 5 hours later got you to pick up the same bags and one of them was 4 kg heavier you wouldn't be able to tell which one it was or if at all there was any difference. Given that you were not told before there would be a quiz on the weight of the bags when you completed the exercise
Jolly, if you have ever travelled with a boogie board, you'd know that would be the one piece of luggage that would be light. No matter if you have 10 other pieces of checked in luggage, that boogie board bag would be light because those boards are light. One does not usually cram heavy items in those bags alongside the board because it can damage the board itself. And had you seen video images of what they'd pulled out of that bag, you'd know that it was not the type of bag that one could stuff with other items except things that one normally would in those bags. In fact, from what I've seen so far, the bag appeared to only have the board in it. And the introduction of the bag of drugs into that bag would have been noticable to any individual, even one off a plane after 5 hours to someone who'd been flying for 25 hours. While you may not be aware of how much you carry and can't tell the difference, carry a boogie board in its bag anywhere and you'd know it's weight because they are so damned light. So maybe YOU should actually pick up one of those boards and see for yourself. If you cant tell if the weight of an item has doubled, then that's something you need to deal with for yourself.
The woman was carrying 4.1 kg of pot, tightly packed in a plastic zip lock bag, placed inside her boogie board bag. Whether it was placed there after it was checked in is dubious, because the weight of the bag did not appear to have been changed from when she'd checked it in to when she picked it up off the carousel in Denpasar airport. The records don't show that more weight had been added to the that piece of luggage. So either someone packed it into the bag when she wasn't looking or she's managed to keep the braying down to a minimum.
Tiassa said:
In the age of terror, are dogs checking for drugs on Australia's outbound flights, or just explosives and such?
From what I know, it's on inbound flights that dogs check for drugs. The bags are usually checked for any item that could constitute as being a threat to the flight prior to take off. Bags are usually checked when entering a country. Some bags may be checked on outbound flights if there is something suspect and some bags may be checked at random. I know that mail is checked inbound and outbound, but it appears that luggage on planes do not suffer the same level of scrutiny in regards to drug checks. Apparently an inquiry is being launched to investigate how someone's luggage could be tampered with in such a manner and also investigating the accusations that a drug trafficking ring exists in Austalia's domestic airports. I guess the inquiry will come up with one recommendation for all travellers... have a lock on all your luggage. If anything can come out of this whole thing, it should be this:
But he declined to name the airport employee he believed planted the 4.1kg of marijuana in the
unlocked case because of fears of reprisal or murder.
Link
Make sure all your pieces of luggage are always locked upon check-in. It seems Corby forgot about that important little detail when she packed her things for her holiday. After all, who in the hell travels anywhere now days without a lock on the luggage their checking in? Especially when going to somewhere like Bali? Talk about extreme lack of common sense.
Tiassa said:
Who is stupid enough to not know the drug laws in the country they're transporting to?
You'd be surprised. Look into any Asian jail, you'd find quite a few Westerners in their legal system for bringing drugs into the country. Many Westerners seem to think that foreigners and their security are dumb.
Tiassa said:
Why would an Australian move nine pounds to Indonesia, when market prices favor greater affluence, such as might be found in Australia by comparison?
Idiocy knows no bounds. According to the convicted felon who's flown to Bali in her defence, it was a mistake and she was the victim of a domestic drug trafficking ring:
"Schapelle Corby is a victim of domestic drug trafficking by what I regard as petty criminals and cowards."
Link
Tiassa said:
How did nine pounds of marijuana get onto an international flight in the first place?
The same as it and more gets on international flights all the time. They slip by. People carry drugs on international flights on a daily basis.
As to the witness who has given her defence hope? Well it's all hearsay evidence. The witness has flown to Bali to give evidence that he heard two prisoner's talking about the drugs that were placed in her bag and he'd heard them talk about the owner of the drugs. I guess the country will know more tonight if they tune into one particular current affairs show that has paid the supposedly true owner of the drugs $15,000 to tell the truth about the pot. Hell for that much money, what known criminal wouldn't tell.
The Channel 9 program A Current Affair has reportedly paid Melbourne man Ron Vigenser - who has been named in a Bali court as being linked to a drug consignment allegedly planted on Ms Corby - $15,000 for an interview.
The program signed the contract with Vigenser, who estimates he has about 150 convictions, the Herald Sun reported.
Link
Nice to know someone will be laughing all the way to the bank.
This whole saga is a complete fiasco. Here we have a woman, found with 4.1 kgs of drugs in her luggage saying 'it's not mine'... like anyone would admit it was theirs in such a situation?... and her best line of defence is a criminal on remand for crimes such as rape and assualt, who's flown there from a Victorian jail to give evidence that he heard 2 other prisoners discussing the true owner of the drugs in jail? I find that mind boggling. The criminal's plea that it's not hers and she's not a drug user does nothing for her case, because how would he know whether she was a user or not? He's a criminal in Victoria and she's a Gold Coast beauty school student and she's claiming she doesn't do drugs. The ironic thing about his statements is this:
But Victorian prisoner John Patrick Ford refused to reveal who put drugs in her luggage, citing fears for her life as well as for his own.
Link
The woman's on death row, her life is in danger. As for his own life, well he should be scared for blabbing in the first place. But I guess in a way it has all turned out great for the supposed true drug owner, seeing that he's suddenly $15,000 richer for selling his story to the media. As I said before... fiasco.