I'm tired. It sounds a little too much like 1930's German cleansing shit to me, but maybe I'll re-read it tomorrow.
Interesting theory, too bad it's wrong. In fact, the truth is exactly the opposite. Homosexuality is a variation on a set of genes that actually result in greater heterosexual fertility in most cases. That's why it persists. Often genes that produce a "desired" result in terms of evolutionary fitness are retained even though they sometimes seem to cause lack of fitness in a few situations, such as the gene in Africans that resists malaria while also in some cases causing sickle-cell anemia. The benefit outweighs the cost.I don't think it's that absurd, it would at least provide a plausible biological mechanism behind the emergence of homosexuality in human beings: Overpopulation. ...
I do have the impression, that there are fewer gays in rural regions versus urban. And consequently, that there are more anti-gay biggots in rural regions, because they're not exposed to the phenomenon as often. But then I also don't know if actual statistics would back that up, I could be wrong.
Wellwisher said:Let us do this other way. Say the photographer was gay. He was asked to photograph a religious couple who he heard speak openly against homosexuality. They did not know the photographer gay, but his feelings are hurt and he says, no. He offers to give them the number of another photographer who is also good. He is has the right to refuse business.
(Boldface accent added)
The couple has a chip in their shoulder and feel they are being singled out because of their religious views. They call their friends and activists to help bully and intimidate the photographer. They also try to undermine his business by intimidating his customers, following some to their homes. Would this be be OK? The answer is no even though this is a parallel. The reason is the dual standard.
The law was intended to make a single standard by taking away the dual standard.
nice to know that there is no low you won't sink to to defend your sexism and bigotry.Currently there is a dual standard, where two sets of rules apply. Only a male can be called chauvinistic, even if a women says the same type of words about men. The quota system, is a prime example. This is backed by laws that give priority to certain demographics; female, black and homosexual. If white, straight, males created parallel laws, that allows quotas for themselves, this would be called racist, sexist and homophobic. But the other way around, is not defined that way, even though an objective person can see these are the same. Only subjective arguments can be used to justify this.
Martin Luther King said, he had a dream that a man would be judged by the content of character and not the color of his skin. He did not see a quota system, since such a system is based on a group criteria, like skin color, and not on character which is individual; case by case. He did not see a dual standard as his final vision. The dual standard was what he was trying to evolve away from; white quota system. Democrats did not understand his message, being the party of slavery.
This dual standard, supported by irrational law, is being abused by militant homosexual and feminists groups. The law is such that the dual standard allows bigots to be protected, as though their actions cannot be called bigoted. The new laws in Indiana are about leveling the playing field, so there is one standard for all. Those who benefit but the dual standard, think the dual standard line, is fair territory. It is by law but not by any rational standard. They are not being rational enough to see this is foul for the other guy, defined as fair for them, only by dual standard laws.
If we judged all by content of character, then there is two teams; character and no character, with men, women, black, white, homosexual and straight on both teams. The lines of superficial things become less important. The dual standard keeps the surface in view, because it is designed to be unfair and therefore create a backlash that forces segregation. This allow men and women of no character to lead the various demographics; militants leading the good at heart.
You are not only a liar, but I called you out on this before. MLK was undoubtedly in favor of affirmative action and reparations for slavery. How do I know? Because he said so. He was asked: "Do you feel it's fair to request a multibillion-dollar program of preferential treatment for the Negro, or for any other minority group?"He did not see a dual standard as his final vision. The dual standard was what he was trying to evolve away from; white quota system. Democrats did not understand his message, being the party of slavery.
What kind of standard is that? All you are saying is that Christians can be as lame as Muslims due to their stupid religious bigotry.
Lard knows we can't be having pizzas sent to support THESE decadent ways of living. (I forget what verse in the Bible that comes from.)
If you think racism goes away once we’re all one big happy color with all the infidels weeded out, well I got news for you, you’re missing it big time. Don’t you see? First you kill off all the other races, then you start killing off all the other religions. Then, you start killing off the left-handed people, then you start killing off each other over the lengths of your crew-cuts. Then finally, finally, there’s only one guy left - and no doubt that crazy motherf---er will attack the mirror.
- Dennis Miller.
In modern societies, gays may gravitate to urban areas because a wider array of behaviors are tolerated there
Now there's some christian-owned pizza joint in Indiana threatening to withhold service from gay weddings. It's already accumulated $50,000 in donations! Well if being gay and married is such a sinful lifestyle they don't wanna support it with their services, why not deny gays just living together? Or gays dating? Or gays like me who just live alone and look at homoerotic art? Why not withhold service from atheists, pagans, backsliders, and drug abusers? Lard knows we can't be having pizzas sent to support THESE decadent ways of living. (I forget what verse in the Bible that comes from.)
This is basically why Republicans have passed these laws. The sole intent of these laws is to provide statutory grounds for discrimination. Aside from the moral argument, that presents a huge problem for business. It makes it virtually impossible for medium and larger businesses to manage their businesses. Employees would no longer have to obey work rules they find or create a religious objection to. It's stupid law created to rally the conservative base around the Republican Party. Laws similar to this have become the norm in Republican controlled states. Most of them have passed without too much notice. Republicans finally got their privates caught in the wringer with this one. Two of their constituencies are at logger heads. Oh, what will they do?Now there's some christian-owned pizza joint in Indiana threatening to withhold service from gay weddings. It's already accumulated $50,000 in donations! Well if being gay and married is such a sinful lifestyle they don't wanna support it with their services, why not deny gays just living together? Or gays dating? Or gays like me who just live alone and look at homoerotic art? Why not withhold service from atheists, pagans, backsliders, and drug abusers? Lard knows we can't be having pizzas sent to support THESE decadent ways of living. (I forget what verse in the Bible that comes from.)
You need to explain to me, why that notion would be offensive. 'Cause it's certainly not what I'm going for. Do you have an issue with humans being an animal species, or what is it?
People like yourself don't know when they are wrong for they seem to think they must always be right, which they aren't of course.
Right. And if not?
Is there any issue with perceiving the human being as another animal species in the landscapes this day and age?