hhehee i think they had sex before marriage and god was like OOO lets use them!!!
tho, i cant help but wonder, if maybe they lied? what if that was just their excuse? lol.
OK.
One last time.
There is a difference between a "Virgin Birth" and the "Immaculate Conception".
Immaculate Conception was NOT the conception of Jesus.
That is YOUR ideaImmaculate Conception was the conception of Mary. Mary's mother was not a virgin. Mary was concieved in the traditional way of her dad banging her mom.
The Immaculate Conception is, according to Roman Catholic Dogma, the conception of the Virgin Mary without any stain (macula in Latin) of original sin.
Immaculate Concpetion has nothing to do with being a virgin or being born to a virgin.
As far as I am aware, the Catholics were the first in history to even convieve of "Original Sin", therefore, no other group had any need for their savior to be born excluded from "Original Sin" so nobody ever had to make up the "Immaculate Conception" before.
In Catholic Doctrine, it is Jesus that redeems man of his Original Sin through his own suffering and death. Without Original Sin, you don't need an "Immaculate Conception".
Do you understand now?
Wiki is THE SAME AS MINE. Immaculate Conception of Mary, mother of Jesus.and wiki is
No, because I am done attempting to have an actual discussion with an ass whose ignorance is only matched by his arrogance.mr educational one, perhaps you can share what you find on the 'virgin birth' (your EXACT WORDS) and see if there is something OLDER
Wiki is THE SAME AS MINE. Immaculate Conception of Mary, mother of Jesus.
Everyone is born a virgin.
sorryNo, because I am done attempting to have an actual discussion with an ass whose ignorance is only matched by his arrogance.
*************That's not what Immaculate Conception is - if you are referring to the Catholic Dogma.
Most Catholics don't even realize that the Immacualte Conception was not the conception of Jesus - it was Mary's conception.
Mary's natural conception was a miracle, because God blessed her to be a pure vessel for his son - in Catholic Dogma, this pure vessel needed to be exempt from "Original Sin".
It has nothing at all to do with not having parents or sex.
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07674d.htm
*************I recall watching a TV program discussing Jesus virgin birth reputation and they were saying, that in some archive a record was found listing a Roman crucifixion in Jerusalem naming a Jesus. The record stated he was the illegitimate son of a sailor.
*************
M*W: There is a stele or a tombstone of a Roman soldier named Pantera. I forget his whole name. Too lazy to look it up again. Some people say the name means "panther," but I think it could mean something like "Pan (bread) tera (of the earth), but then, that's just me. The story goes that he either raped Mary or had an affair with her, and that he is the natural father of Jesus. This gravesite is allegedly somewhere in Germany. Info on this can be found on the Internet.
can we get a poll on this one?
It is not a ****ing interpretation, you ****ing moron. It is a ****ing fact.anyone else have a go?
anything older, than today's interpretation by the 1bird?
as well anyone with any comprehension, knows that the IM is 'considered' to be "Jesus being conceived by mary, without sex."
Gday,
The what?
The "IM" ?
You can't even read and write English correctly.
K.
all births are children born virginSo,
you're still pretending that the
Virgin Birth
is impossible; even read what Jesus saidand the
Immaculate Conception
Well, I claim that he was, because he was the Incarnate being of God. None may come to the Father except through Me. Etc.
jeff, we know you believe but you just don't read
matt 16:20 Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ