Re: video link
Originally posted by Squashbuckler
do you have a videolink for that bud?
Squash: drawn here by the title with some opinion to share, I enjoyed your original posting and several subsequent ones; but this one "bud" sounds like you're getting on the defensive.
Now, I'm sure you are sensitive to the frequent abuse police may suffer for the public's anger at the mountains of bad regulations (laws that wouldn't pass muster under Constitutional review).
And I can't speak for Canada entirely, except to say I have maintained a residence and office in Montreal for many years and have had frequent cause to admire the demeanor of the RCMP and local officers. I had the distinct impression they're above continental average for quality and courtesy, I can, however, speak with some authority on police and regulations in the U.S.of A.
In the past sixty years (by personal observation) the status of American (U.S.) policeman has changed from friend to enemy. This has many causal issues. Increased population, increase in a persistently ugly element in the population, and not least a tremendous increase in regulations that intrude on our freedoms and infringe on our (U.S.) rights.
In those 3 score years, I have learned that it is increasingly difficult for a good officer to succeed in the U.S. as the mood and management has changed to Bully and Enforce, bring in the bucks (fines).
I may be optimistic but there have been recent signs, with the excellent pay and benefits, higher quality people are being drawn to the profession.
That said; the profession has always attracted bully's and those whose psychological weaknesses succumb to the opportunity to assert authority.
All this ties to the opening comment. You need not feel on the defensive, nor need you defend the many policemen who
are bad actors.
I have had the opportunity to read many of Sparks postings, and while I can assure you I do not always agree with him, I have not once seen him go off half cocked.
Thanks, HBH