Xelasnave.1947
Valued Senior Member
None to do so would be a crime.What prescription drugs would you sell ?
Alex
None to do so would be a crime.What prescription drugs would you sell ?
I think folk forget the purpose and function of breasts.I remember, as a young whipper snapper well before I became a nurse, finding out about breast implants. Not only that but my fantasy ladies in Playboy made use of this procedure
I felt cheated that the two objects of my deepest desires were fake and I had been in love with a few kilograms of plastic jel
river said: ↑
What prescription drugs would you sell ?
None to do so would be a crime.
Alex
Presumably within the law.Yet pharma corporations , pharma retailers , do it everyday .
Off topic.
I think one can find a message in my story.
Whilst having a most enjoyable conversation with a lady at the then my local pub...she had large breasts and showed a large portion of them by her choice in clothes .
she said.
"You know what I like about you Alex you don't talk to my breasts"
Eye contact with a man was somewhat novel.
Alex
If I were the only doctor in the world, would I be obligated to provide abortions?
What has being the only doctor in the world got to do with the morality of abortion or the laws regarding abortion? I get the point that there would be no one else to do it but that's still beside the point.
The point is that if the law is that doctors do abortions then if you are a doctor you do abortions. If all medical decisions rely on the doctor's personal view of morality then they won't be done if that is the doctor's viewpoint.Perhaps the more important question:
What does "religious freedom" and "freedom from persecution" mean?
To my understand, freedom of religion means "I cannot do that because it is against my religion" (ergo, "I cannot have an abortion because I don't believe in them" or "I cannot have a homosexual relationship because I do not believe in them")
Telling someone else "You cannot do that because it is against my religion" would seem to be persecution (ergo, "You cannot have an abortion because I don't believe in them" or "You cannot have a homosexual relationship because I do not believe in them")
Seems like a simple distinction all told...
Thus, if your religion would prevent you from being party to something that you are uniquely equipped to provide (such as a service industry, medical industry, etc), then perhaps the correct response is to not be in said industry... or to realize that your "religious freedom" allows you to not do said action yet does not allow you to prohibit others from doing so.
I think that is, exactly, the point, though - in many areas, facilities that otherwise provided these services are being shut down because of this mindset of "I don't believe in this, thus you cannot do it"... how is that any different than "You must marry this person I've chosen for you because my religion gives me that right" or "You will be killed because you said something that offends my religion"?
All are implying that someone else's freedom of religion trumps that person's freedom of religion and right to bodily autonomy.
The point is that if the law is that doctors do abortions then if you are a doctor you do abortions. If all medical decisions rely on the doctor's personal view of morality then they won't be done if that is the doctor's viewpoint.
St. Augustine is considered a Christian doctrinal authority in all respects, helping to shape the Christian religion and finer points of doctrine and practices. His statements and teaching on abortion can be summarized in this quote: “The law does not provide that the act (abortion) pertains to homicide, for there cannot yet be said to be a live soul in a body that lacks sensation.” He was simply reiterating the traditional Jewish view…that the destruction of a fetus could be considered homicide only at a relatively late stage of fetal development.
St. Thomas Aquinas held a similar view in not calling abortion homicide until around the third trimester. Aquinas did not believe in life at conception, but rather “ensoulment.” He offered no defense for abortion, but also did not give the matter much importance in comparison to his other writings.
Did you go home with her?Off topic.
I think one can find a message in my story.
Whilst having a most enjoyable conversation with a lady at the then my local pub...she had large breasts and showed a large portion of them by her choice in clothes .
she said.
"You know what I like about you Alex you don't talk to my breasts"
Eye contact with a man was somewhat novel.
Alex
Until it was my turn to play in the pool comp.How long did you keep that up !!!!
No, I was there to win the pool comp and certainly not interested in starting a relationship.Did you go home with her?
That's what I thought. She didn't put those puppies on display for nothing.No, I was there to win the pool comp and certainly not interested in starting a relationship.
Alex
She might not feel the same way."If you were the only girl in the world
And I were the only boy...."
If you were the only anything in the world, your obvious priority would be to make more. Long-term thinking versus short-term.
Hint. They are done everywhere. If a doctor is in a situation where a procedure (no matter what the procedure is) is called for and the doctor refused to do the procedure due to a belief they should loose their licenceIn that case, the person in question probably shouldn't choose to work somewhere that does abortions.
The law does not provide that the act (abortion) pertains to homicide, for there cannot yet be said to be a live soul in a body that lacks sensation..
The firs pair I ever saw had been removed from a patient who had a bad reaction. They were lying in vat of formalin - these stupid little sacks of transparent... nothing... And they were slightly different weights!Michael had been in love with a few kilograms of plastic jel
No problem with sensible reasons of usageimplant