I believe it's Augustine
Frankly, I'm too lazy to look it up, but I think the paradox comes from Saint Augustine. This, along with the notion of the
square circle, is a classic Catholic postulation of the limitations of God's omnipotence. In the one case, the possibility of impossibility is the paradox; in the other, terms which cancel each other out;
square and
circle represent two disparate concepts that cannot be identical, as such. The capability of God's inadequacy isn't applicable. To answer the conundrum is about as useful as killing oneself in order to demonstrate that you are (were) alive.
Consider, on the other hand, a similar concept. I have, before, advocated a model of the Universe which resembles the concepts of a computer program; God is the programmer, the data is His Knowledge, and the routines are His Will. Respecting Relativity, at least, the Universe is generally obliged to play by certain rules. As the routines run over and over again, the output is the Universe and its events. If you're familiar with Deep Thought in Adams'
Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, you're halfway there.
Now, in terms of the stone: can you build a computer that accounts for
everything in the Universe? Consider that, with multiple Cray supercomputers in the 80s and 90s (nor with G4 PowerMacs in the new millennium), scientists are unable to simulate a space shuttle flight with any reasonably useful accuracy. A video game, sure. But practical application? Jinkies, Shaggy ....
(You know, I bet Shaggy made a fortune in the 80s; some diet pills and Scooby Snax, and I bet you he could code like a demon.)
Or would such a computer constitute the whole of the Universe, anyway? Somebody, quickly: harness a practical application for Mandelbröt. Theorize, theorize, theorize ....
Likewise, would God have to devote a part of Himself to the creation of that stone so that it might be at least His equal? (Not even Jesus or the Holy Spirit have that status, by most postulations.)
I would reason that no, God could not make a stone too heavy to lift.
And on that note, I must digress:
Armyboyjay ... with respect, sir ... who says God can't lie, cheat, steal, hump like a rabbit, or contradict Himself, among others? With the exception of the bit about humping, I think the rest of it is documented in the Bible at least. I would go so far as to state definitively that the least contradictory deities are those that keep their mouths shut. The mysterium still reigns supreme, for God is greater than that which can be conceived; another piece of classic, forgotten Catholic theology.
On second reading, I may have buzzed right past a note of sarcasm, but, having missed it the first time, I can sit here and doubt myself all night if I try. Nonetheless, I needed to pop off a line about God humping like a rabbit; quite badly, apparently ... :bugeye:
Thus I beg your pardon if I let the above digression stand.
thanx,
Tiassa