what lunacy is this!, roflmao.
you were never an atheist, maybe an agnostic, but never an atheist.
but thanks for the laugh, it cheered me up no end , thanks again. roflmao, you great, you should be on stage, your so funny. the experience was probably, an hallucination, from the L.S.D. you were taking, that is what your name means right. and you never had an atheist view in the first place.even if you had'nt been on drugs at the time, some kind of truamatic episode happened to you, perhaps a schizoid embolism caused by past abuse.
I know someone who got hit on the head, just slightly, and two weeks later was ill with concussion, so you see you could have done, something to yourself days/weeks/years before and it only manifested it's self at that moment.and where is this done, may I ask.
could you supply a reference, thank you.agreed, you cast out the illogical and the unreasonable, until your left with the only possible reasoning, that is the scientific way. .exactly..the only ones that get disregarded, are those that can not possibly fit, the unreasonable, the illogical, the irrational.
c20H25N3o said:
I hadn't even entertained the possibility that the 'God thing' might actually be true. Logic stood and mocked me for a brief while after my conversion[/quote were you surprised. .and thats exactly, how it gets done.
however if being religious makes you happy, be happy.
delude yourself with your religion, but dont add to it, by believing you were once an atheist, because you were not, agnostic possibly.
a·the·ist ( P ) Pronunciation Key (th-st)
n.
One who disbelieves or denies the existence of God or gods.
the main thrust of your post audible is basically saying that I am deluding myself into thinking I was an atheist. The dictionary definition of atheist is pretty simple and I was one who denied the existance of God. That was my thinking. I did not entertain the possibility of a God, it wasn't something that fitted with reality. I was like that for a long time UNTIL I realised that my denial had to be tested in order for me to be true to myself. I was not an agnostic according to the dictionaries definition of the word. I wasn't wooley in my thinking or undecided. I flat out believed that God was a metaphorical security blanket for the deluded and they were welcome to their delusions. But yes I was unfaithful to the principals of atheism at the point where I challenged the denial. If I was right in my atheistic views then genuinly giving 'God' a chance meant I could have personal proof that God did not exist and so when challenged by religious types I could say with hand on heart 'your god does not exist' and when they said their crap like 'you have never sought him.', I could say 'look you feebs, I did ask and what did I get? Nothing Nada Zilch.', however I preempted the further challenge of 'but your heart was not in it.', so I made sure when I asked that my heart was in it. There was no point in being dishonest about it. I did not expect to experience what I experienced but it did mean that I could no longer say 'God does not exist.'
You also say that my experience was related to some form of drug taking. You are going to say that simply because you are an atheist. I could argue until I was blue in the face that the experiences were not related in any way or even had any of the same feel about them but you have your rationale for what I have said and I do not expect you to take any other stance. However L.S.D is a dirty drug that produces largely a confusing experience. The experience upon asking God to make Himself known to me was clean and pure and to my mind the experience was diametrically opposed to the confusing experience that taking L.S.D. is.
Laugh all you want, as long as you dont have to take my words at face value right? Better just call me deluded or whatever. Makes no odds to me.
peace
c20