CEngelbrecht
Registered Senior Member
Moderator note: This thread was split from the following thread:
Readers who would like to discuss the aquatic ape hypothesis rather than wasting time on CEngelbrecht's personal gripes and insults are directed to that thread.
-------
Do you actually want me to answer? Or will you just demand my ban all over again when I do and you can't shoot it down, even though you know it's supposed to be easy to shoot down?
The aquatic ape hypothesis was never crazy
None of you have taken apart seeing water in human loss of fur coupled with blubberesque skinfat. Fully from all those annoying analogies seen in other mammal species in the tree of life who evolved exactly the same traits for that exact wet reason, or all those that didn't for dry reasons...
www.sciforums.com
Readers who would like to discuss the aquatic ape hypothesis rather than wasting time on CEngelbrecht's personal gripes and insults are directed to that thread.
-------
So... where's the discussion topic? What is the hypothesis and what do you want to say about it that we can discuss? All I see is a nice epistemological homily and an illustration.
Do you actually want me to answer? Or will you just demand my ban all over again when I do and you can't shoot it down, even though you know it's supposed to be easy to shoot down?
Last edited by a moderator: