DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
Correct. That should have been your opening post.
And it would have been a very short thread.
How To Run Religion Out Of Science
- Thread starter newnature
- Start date
And it would have been a very short thread.
Science analyse on what subject matter and life on our solar system , but science does not know how it started and speculate on possibility on how it happen , based on some analysed observations and then extrapolate .
Science should stay entirely outside the scope of scientific analysis God. The bible doesn't set out to prove their is a God, so science shouldn't either. Cain is culpable, and for someone to be culpable of something, we have to assume some principle that they have violated. There seems to be in existence from the beginning of creation this universal moral law, and that is: Yahweh-endowed sanctity of human life. The fact that Yahweh has created humans in his own image, but Yahweh-endowed sanctity of human life is an assumption, and it’s the violation of the assumption which makes Cain culpable.
Science wouldn't want to violate an assumption, so it would look at the facts of the assumption and leave the rest alone.
Science wants to see the facts of an assumption, not religion's point of view. Science knows where religion started.
Science would demand that common sense analysis was used. First of all, science would want to understand why is there a universes. Science is aware of Gen. 3:15, because it forces science to take another look at the forth 'a day'.
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
No. Science deals with the what and the how. Never the why. That's for philosophers.
Philosophy is religion, science is aware of it roots, so it would dismiss philosophy. In order for science to analyze the what and how, it would indeed want to know the why.
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
You can say that all you want; it is false.
You will not find a single self-respecting scientist who thinks science has to do with why things are.
A self-respecting scientist would indeed what to know the why of an objects history. Now the scientist can study the what and how.
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
I think you do not know what a scientist does.
Genesis 1:1 shouldn’t have happened. The bible assumes that the great usurper exits and never questions that assumption. The earth flooded out proves the great usurper is not an unfounded assumption. The beginning of the universe is in Genesis 1:1. Darkness was upon the earth, it appears the earth is in some kind of black substance. The great usurper and those who helped him out are on the earth, but would they be willing to explore this black substance? This black substance is so dark, the great usurper can’t see his hand in front of his face.
I agree with you, I don't.
newnature:
Science doesn't really concern itself with God, unless a religious text (like the bible) or person makes scientific claims.
What kind of analysis do you have in mind?
The bible assumes the existence of God throughout.
Science doesn't really concern itself with God, unless a religious text (like the bible) or person makes scientific claims.
Thou shalt not kill?
Yeah, that fits the mythology.
Right.
No. Science shows that those assumptions are wrong, like you say.
Science is a form of philosophy. Also it has shown that the Bible is largely fiction. Sin is likewise just a religious concept, there is nothing that can be tested. There was certainly no worldwide flood coinciding with human habitation of Earth.