Prov that the spped of light limitiation is bunk then, smartarse. the IS a way around it!
I can't believe we're having this discussion. The proof is in the pudding; the fastest speed ever observed in the universe is the speed of light. And no, that doesn't refer to just light, either. The speed of light is a definition, not a theory. The speed of light is the fastest anything can go. There are little tricks, such as things appearing as if they're moving faster than lightspeed, but those observations are based on the witness's frame of reference. Anyway, there's no point arguing it.
But wait one second, partner...How are you going to ask me to prove anything?
You're the one making the claim, so why don't
you prove to
me that there is such a thing as faster than light travel? What's that? Oh, you can't? Oh, your claims are all baseless and without a single shred of evidence? Oh, I see...well then...
I was saying IF an object had a device that affected its magnetic gravity field causing it to have no weight or momentum(discs and/or orbs have been seen stopping on a dime from thousands of mph) then maybe Einstiens Law might not apply(if the object weights nothing its mass cant be multiplied im thinking)
OK, there is a problem with that statement. You are basing your theory on something which hasn't been proven...meaning, you are basing the idea of the possible mechanics of faster than light travel on the mechanics of...a friggin UFO?? C'mon, man! We don't even know if UFOs exist (and they most likely do not) so how are you going to base your claim of FTL travel on them? It's not sound, man.
Or instant teleportation(lab tests are being done where tiny things like protons are being teleported)
Now this stuff is interesting. I've done some light reading on the subject, and I think there is some very, very interesting stuff in there, but we are so far from knowing to what extent this branch of science can be of use to us, that it's not even worth discussing.
Or perhaps it is set up so only sufficiently spiritually evolved peoples will be able to travel the stars, we atm are not, we are to trigger happy and war oriented. Once we evolve past all that i have no doubt we will recieve help from our Allies in space spiritually and techology wise so as to be able to travel the universe helping others and exploring.
That's cute. No, really, it is. But it's stupid and childish, as well. No, really, it is.
"Spritually evolved"? I'm sorry, pal, but again, you are equating science to spirituality, and there is no connection. The human spirit, as it were, is merely a fantasy. Consider the human spirit, and all the good that comes along with it, an equal to the human emotions of the "heart". Now, we know the heart's true function, but that does not stop us from continually equating our loves and passions to it. When we fall in love, we say that we "gave our heart to someone", and when we do kind things and charitable things, it is said that we have a "Kind heart", when in fact, all our hearts do is pump blood, man. The root (and practice and apllication) of our emotion lies in our brain. Nowhere else.
The same can be said of our spirit. If you are a follower of God, you follow with your brain, not your spirit. If you are a good person, it is because your brain chemistry allows it. The same applies if you are a bad person.
To be "spiritually evolved" is a matter of the brain, my friend. There is no spirit, as you believe it.
But anyway, you're losing credibility with this post.
And here is another reason...
Do you mean that you do not believe humans to still be evolving(if not physically at least consciously?) Or that you dont believe we will one day evolve into peacefull beings?
Exactly. Our genetic makeup does not call for peace. We are animals. To believe that humanity will one day have no use for war or for fighting is a romantic fancy that has no base in reality. We are possessive, territorial creatures who will always fight for what we believe to be ours. And why? Because there will always be someone who will try to take what is ours!
The seperation between Man and the rest of the animal kingdom is small. We share 97% of our DNA with a certain chimpanzee, I believe, so what makes you think we are so far superior? At least in the sense of doing away with what comes so naturally? We have become what we are thanks to our intelligence, and the physical tools which we were given. Thanks to our deductive reasoning, we were able to take control of land and animal and become what we are today. If it was not for the very things you are condemning us, we would not be around today.
And don't think that because we are here we should abolish it. First of all, we can't; it's in our genes, and it will always be there. Secondly, if we were to lose the instinctual desire to take, we would lose society and structure.
Think of it this way; the rest of the animal kingdom we see today is in a form that is best suited for life in this environment. Tigers look and act the way they do because it bests suits them. Elephants look and act the way they do because that way works. Humans look and act the way they do becuase that way works. I'm not saying that Man won't someday evolve further, but you must understand that there is no reason to change. Our physical and mental makeup works, there's no better way to say it. Evolution occurs so that a species can survive in a certain environment, and what we see today is just that: A species that can survive. There has not been a significant change to the Human physical structure since the rise of the Homo Sapien, most likely because that is the epitome of what Man needs to be.
JD
