Oh, pish-tosh.
The Kalam (Time) Argument: If the universe had a beginning at all, the beginning cannot rest on nothingness but God. If the universe had, instead, an infinite past and is without beginning and uncreated, then it is impossible to have arrived at the present moment, in the same way as it is impossible to jump out of a bottomless pit....
So, where did God come from? If God's infinite, without beginning or end, that means this argument rules that he cannot exist now, since you cannot jump out of that bottomless pit...
1. The fact of change proves an ultimate agent of change!
No, perhaps it proves that there is simply NO agent of consistencey, ie. no god.
2. The chain of causation proves a first cause that needs to be uncaused to end the otherwise endless chain of events!
Huh? Is this back to your Kalam (Time) argument? What caused God?
3. The contingent facts of the world require an ultimate Being!
Says who? This isn't proof, just a statement. And who is to say that ultimate being isn't, say, Siva, dancing the world into existance and biding his time before he dances it back out?
4. The fact of graduation of things as higher and lower suggests Perfected Being at the top of the hierarchy!
This graduation you speak of is an artificial standard percieved by human beings. We're funny little monkeys, we have to measure and compare everything and set up little ranking systems to make our world seem orderly. That doesn't mean those perceptions are accurate in any way, shape or form.
5. The order and design found in nature suggest a highest Being at the Source!
Not necessarily. Humans see order when there is none. Ever see a "face" in woodgrain? Yes, we see patterns in things, but that's easily explained as being the results of evolution and time. Chaos, you know - as time goes by, things fall into a certain order. The leaves on my walkway happen to have a clear path down the middle - it doesn't mean God got down on his knees and arranged the leaves that way, it's just a result of the way the wind blows down my street and whips around my house. And then there's the simple fact that if there was no consistancy, we'd have ceased to exist long ago.
1. Ontological: It is possible to imagine a perfect being. Such a being could not be perfect unless its essence included existence. Therefore a perfect being must exist.
Really? Well, I am currently imagining a perfect unicorn, and it's essence definitely includes being real. Therefore, this unicorn must be around here somewhere... Hm, can't find it. Maybe God's riding it.
2. Causal: Everything must have a cause. It is impossible to continue backwards to infinity with causes, therefore there must have been a first cause which was not conditioned by any other cause. That cause must be God.
Great! And so you will have no trouble explaining what caused God, then?
3-Design: Animals, plants and planets show clear signs of being designed for specific ends, therefore there must have been a designer.
Yes, that designer is called "evolution". It is the mechanism by which living beings gradually change over generations in order to survive on our ever-changing planet. All of the bad designs have died. We see bad designs still crop up, they usually die. Unless they're human, in which case we save them so they can breed later - we're stupid that way.
3a. Modern design argument: the Anthropic Cosmological Principle. ... The laws of the universe seem to have been framed in such a way that stars and planets will form and life can emerge. Many constants of nature appear to be very finely tuned for this, and the odds against this happening by chance are astronomical.
Not if you consider the theory that the universe is indeed infinite, and the so-called "Big Bang" was just the most recent in an endless series of collapses and explosions. Given that theory, it doesn't matter how astronomical the chances are - with enough time those chances would eventually be hit. In fact, it makes the chances seem *slimmer*, because if things weren't so balanced the universe would have collapsed again right away. So perhaps it winks in and out rapidly until it happens to hit upon a stable combination.
4-Experiential: A very large number of people claim to have personal religious experiences of God.
Great! Good for them. A very large number of people also claim to have personal experiences with aliens, Satan, Elvis, vampires and elves. Personal experiences don't count for squat until they happen to you. I have had personal religious experiences, by the way, and the Gods I met were nothing like the Xtian Daddy-God. So...what does that mean to anybody but me? Squat, that's what.