Most, if not all, of the physical energy (or KE as you have taken to calling it) applied by a mortal and pestle with simply lose itself in the air as thermal energy.
Hello Mr.Hans,
My problem is that I do not deny anything which is existing since long. I tries to understnd & take all the 'Goods' in anything, may be a spritual or a science.
I know your profound respect for age, but surely we can agree that, as new knowledge is found, some old knowledge has to be discarded?
I feel that all sprituals are based on the basic science & will become our science when we will translate them in our language or will understand their language. This is just a simple problem of translation.
Maybe, but in some instances, the translation will be "nonexistent". For example, it was believed for thousands of years that Earth was flat and sat in the center of the universe. We now know that this idea was simply mistaken.
It also looks to me that all or most of scientific aspects are initially initiated due to presence of these sprituals which we have translated & expanded in our language. Just take a simple example called 'ONENESS' means everything is created from ' ONE BASIC HIM & HER ' ,which I think is more or less is cleared in my other topic ,' The science of basic elements' . Sprituals are the basis/clues of our science but the problem may be that, we may be translating their language into our language insted of understanding their language directly, so taking lot of time to understand , though not be fully.
That is not translating, it is interpreting.
The best thing to understand them is to initiate some entities with 'Microscopic Eyes' the eyes of our cells being the 'Divya Drishti' with which the ancient basic science was probably formed. They should be capable to see every atomic or sub-atomic happening in the universe.
Ehr, how are you going to do that?
My second problem is that, I don't believe or accept a thing unless it is understood by me in 'Logic' or in 'Science'.
I don't consider that a problem .
I ,personally observed & fully convinced ' that Homeopathic Remedies do work' but how is just now a unclear aspect which I am only trying to understand.
Ahh, but now you contradict your statement above. You are doing the opposite of the science and logic approach: You have convinced yourself that something (homeopathy) exists, and now you are looking for some science that may verify it. And THAT is a problem, because it leads you to interpret things in ways that can confirm your beliefs.
So please try to discuss the mentioned possibilities in this topic & contribute for good cause. It you have any aspect which is allready disapproved, just give me the referances.
But I already did. I explained how energy could be exchanged. I already gave you this link in another thread. You will find detailed info there.
Best Wishes!! Same to you!
This is 'my trying to understand' stage . A thesis can be made from a meaningfull hypothesis.My problem is that I do not deny anything which is existing since long. I tries to understnd & take all the 'Goods' in anything, may be a spritual or a science. My second problem is that, I don't believe or accept a thing unless it is understood by me in 'Logic' or in 'Science'.
I give you my full quote of my both problems. Just read again;
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My problem is that I do not deny anything which is existing since long. I tries to understnd & take all the 'Goods' in anything, may be a spritual or a science. My second problem is that, I don't believe or accept a thing unless it is understood by me in 'Logic' or in 'Science'.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is 'my trying to understand' stage . A thesis can be made from a meaningfull hypothesis.
But I already did. I explained how energy could be exchanged. I already gave you this link in another thread. You will find detailed info there.
Link did't help a bit otherwise you could had awnsered.
The way I see you problem is: Your two approaches are contradictory. You can't both accept old beliefs and make a scinetific approach. The main axiom of science is that NOTHING is held true unless verified. If you want to use a scientific approach, you must be prepared to sort old thruths into three categories:
1) Verified. Evidence supports old knowledge.
2) Invalid. Evidence contradicts old knowledge.
3) Unknown. Evidence neither supports nor contradicts.
Note that as new evidence becomes available, a thesis may change from any category, to any other. Science is NEVER final.
Originally posted by Kumar
Everything can effect. We do feel refresh & eneragetic after bath & satisfied after drinking it. If we observe we can note differant symptoms as differant time. We do find traces of zinc in tap water. It depend upon the source of water which is coming to you tap. We find several types of person here having differant personalities effected due to their water & do find lot of similarities among people living is same area. But still tap water is bit stagnant & mixed with cleanising materials.
Some rivers are called holy because they may contain more useful minerals(silica also) in potentized form. Allthough this is a 'Belief' which may not be understood by all, still believed by mass public. Just try sea bath or some other watersource away from home & note the differances. Sometimes if one has waterly running nose just dissolve a pinch of salt in water, slightly shake it and apply at any soft skin any where on body. You may found your running nose is stopped with in few minutes.
There is a huge difference between faith (what you have shown to posses) and science (what REALLY goes on).
Originally posted by Kumar
This is one's own understanding.
But we are going out of the point. My question is that wheteher PE can be stored in the mixture in any way or not, partly or equally to the KE applied to it.
Don't take chemistry and physics for granted. A lot of work has been going into experimentation and theory to discover and predict behavior.
Everytime you make contact with anything, an electron transfer is inevitable. Sometimes, [/b]constant dynamic contact (like rubbing) causes dislocation of enough electrons to take major effect: Rubbing some type of material against your dry hair causes electrons to change place[/b]
I might add in defence of homeopathy that at the moment our defense against AIDS is more or less the same in that we just throw everything we have at it and hope that somewhere somehow it works and when it does we don't know why either.
The same could be said for chemo therapy for cancer sufferers in that some people recover and some don't and either way we don't know why. Also medications for deppression and Psychotivc conditions are at the best adhoc.
This prompts the question why use say chemo instead of homeopathy? AS at this time the scientific proof is missing for both one might suggest.
As to the electrons jumping up an orbital, your best bet would be silicon, which can manage this with the absorbtion of a photon above the correct energy. However, I don't know whether you could do this just by shaking - I would guess that if you shook it hard enough, then enough thermal energy would be transferred to the atom that the electron might jump up an orbital, but you'd be better off asking someone who knows more about this than me. Anyway, IF the electron managed to jump up an orbital, it could concievably become seperated from the atom, but I don't really see what effect this would have.