Life - why are they looking on Mars when they should be looking on Mercury?
Is this what you get when you post in the Alternative theory section. What sort of meds have you got for me? For you have given me a headache and a pain in the rear end!Um.....okay.....I'm going to call a nurse and tell her it's time for your meds....just stay right there.
They are looking for life on Mars. Do they evidence? I have more evidence than I have typed in as yet. It takes time and I'm tired right now.This isn't an alternative theory, not in science anyways. An alternative theory must still be a theory, i.e. supported by evidence. This is most certainly not that.
Cesspool.
When you come back home give me a call.I like Mercurians, they are a laugh a minute,
you never know what they are going to do next.
Martians always want to start a fight, and clubs won't let them in.
Venusians are just weird. As for Plutonians, they always pretend to be skint, and never buy a round.
No for a night out, always hit the town with a Mercurian.
Mercury is closest to the Sun so in the beginning it was the ideal incubator planet.
They are looking for life on Mars. Do they evidence? I have more evidence than I have typed in as yet. It takes time and I'm tired right now.
There was an announcement they are sending a larger rover up to Mars soon looking for life. i read it yesterday on Google News.@Rob --
No, they really aren't genuinely looking for life on Mars, not our type of life at least. The whole "life on Mars" thing really ended once we sent probes there looking for it and found none, only fringe people are still holding out.
The article said they were specifically looking for signs of life.@Rob --
Yes, they want to send another rover, but that doesn't automatically mean that they're looking for life. There are millions of things we can study about that planet, and we're going to need to study them if we ever want to colonize Mars.
You aren't exactly supporting your argument here. The best way to look for signs of life on Mars would be to do low altitude flyovers, thereby covering far more territory than any single rover could. No, they want samples analyzed to see what they can tell us about Mars' past. Besides, there's at least a possibility of life on Mars because they have water there, Mercury is quite lacking in that department.
Really?There was an announcement they are sending a larger rover up to Mars soon looking for life. i read it yesterday on Google News.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2011/11/10/next-mars-rover-is-prepared-for-launch/NASA made very clear that this isn’t a mission to find life on Mars
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/msl/news/msl20111110.htmlThe rover will investigate whether environmental conditions ever have been favorable for development of microbial life and preserved evidence of those conditions
Well I'll be damned! I'll look again.
I have been discussing it to some degreeNo Robit its a perfectly sound premise please elaborate on the details