You know, our DNA is something like 90%+ animal.
Well, 100% animal, and we share 90% of it with other animals. At least.
So? I don't see any other monkeys that can talk?
You know, our DNA is something like 90%+ animal.
Well, 100% animal, and we share 90% of it with other animals. At least.
So? I don't see any other monkeys that can talk?
It won't become anything. The reason they created them in the first place is to create embryonic stem cells. This is an alternative, since donated human egg cells are in short demand.and what would that come out to become? Who should be responsible for the "creation"?
How do you suppose they'll get the cow-human zygote to implant on the uterus wall of the surrogate?Ok this is how it will could be useful:
Say a couple wants to add another mouth to the human plague but thankfully one or both of them are sterile, so they decide to make a clone, but getting donated human egg cells is very expensive so they use a cow egg cell instead, long story short clone is born that is 99.9% genetically identical to its origional, except it has cow mitochondria.
I've heard 96% with chimps
How do you suppose they'll get the cow-human zygote to implant on the uterus wall of the surrogate?
No, it will have cow markers...it's a cow egg cell, remember.The same way they always do? It not like the zygote will have cow-human markers? Although I would think the accomplishment of engineering a cow or animal that can bare human babies would be far bigger news then this.
No, it will have cow markers...it's a cow egg cell, remember.
Are you sure that's how it works when we're artificially replacing the nucleus?