Gravity never zero

Status
Not open for further replies.
Robittybob1 said:
A Rapid uneducated guess is that the energy condensed into quarks then into particles. Other suggestions??
Click to expand...

Consider the currently accepted Law of Physics that , " total amount of mass and energy of our universe is constant " .

This constancy was also existing at the time of big bang , as mass and energy can neither be created nor destroyed only their mutual conversion is possible .

So, it can be said that at the time of big bang ; total mass and energy was existing in a singularity point as there was no space .
 
Last edited:
hansda said:
Consider the currently accepted Law of Physics that , " total amount of mass and energy of our universe is constant " .

This constancy was also existing at the time of big bang , as mass and energy can neither be created nor destroyed only their mutual conversion is possible .

So, it can be said that at the time of big bang ; total mass and energy was existing in a singularity point as there was no space .
Click to expand...

You have asked several very basic questions about the Big Bang.

Please read this and most of your questions will be answered.
 
hansda said:
Consider the currently accepted Law of Physics that , " total amount of mass and energy of our universe is constant " .

This constancy was also existing at the time of big bang , as mass and energy can neither be created nor destroyed only their mutual conversion is possible .

So, it can be said that at the time of big bang ; total mass and energy was existing in a singularity point as there was no space .
Click to expand...
I know it is hard to imagine but there was nothing to limit the expansion either so it was easy going.
 
origin said:
You have asked several very basic questions about the Big Bang.

Please read this and most of your questions will be answered.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the link .

This link also talks about Big Crunch . Following is a quote from your link .

brane cosmology models[75] in which inflation is due to the movement of branes in string theory; the pre-Big Bang model; the ekpyrotic model, in which the Big Bang is the result of a collision between branes; and the cyclic model, a variant of the ekpyrotic model in which collisions occur periodically. In the latter model the Big Bang was preceded by a Big Crunch and the Universe endlessly cycles from one process to the other.[76][77][78]
Click to expand...



So, total mass and energy of our universe is constant only space is varying .
 
Robittybob1 said:
Space and Time so may be we could include all the other dimensions as well.
Click to expand...

What do you mean by other dimensions ?

Are they expanding , contracting or remaining constant ?

What we know is that our Universe is expanding . That means space of our universe is expanding . Does it mean that ; time is also expanding or contracting ?
 
hansda said:
What do you mean by other dimensions ?

Are they expanding , contracting or remaining constant ?

What we know is that our Universe is expanding . That means space of our universe is expanding . Does it mean that ; time is also expanding or contracting ?
Click to expand...
I'm not a particularly knowledgeable physicist. I'm a bit like a young Einstein working at the patents office, riding trains and elevators to work everyday. Getting his thought experiments together day after day.
If time at the surface of a black whole is zero Time at the Universe boundary might be faster than we experience it here on Earth. I wouldn't say it was infinite.
So time has it's own local rates. There still could be a Universial Time progressing. So that is like "expanding", there is more of it at the very least.
:)
 
Robittybob1 said:
I'm not a particularly knowledgeable physicist. I'm a bit like a young Einstein working at the patents office, riding trains and elevators to work everyday. Getting his thought experiments together day after day.
Click to expand...

You think you are like a young Einstein? You sound like you are awfully impressed with yourself.:rolleyes:

Edited to add:

You do realize that Einstein had a physics degree when he was a patent clerk and was not in graduate school because he pissed of his professors.
 
origin said:
You think you are like a young Einstein? You sound like you are awfully impressed with yourself.:rolleyes:

Edited to add:

You do realize that Einstein had a physics degree when he was a patent clerk and was not in graduate school because he pissed of his professors.
Click to expand...
It's a matter of putting your heart and soul into it. I've got a science degree so that's a start. I'm always pissing people off too. He had youth on his side, but we have incredible computers to do our calculations. What might have taken him a month I could do in a second once I've set up the macro.
 
My physics degree is now about 37 years old.

What's yours in? Aren't you a veterinarian?
 
Robittybob1 said:
It's a matter of putting your heart and soul into it. I've got a science degree so that's a start. I'm always pissing people off too. He had youth on his side, but we have incredible computers to do our calculations. What might have taken him a month I could do in a second once I've set up the macro.
Click to expand...

It must be fun to fantasize that you are on par with Einstein, I tend to think it is better to live in what I like to call the real world.

You can write a macro; wow, Einstein must be so jealous.;)
 
origin said:
It must be fun to fantasize that you are on par with Einstein, I tend to think it is better to live in what I like to call the real world.

You can write a macro; wow, Einstein must be so jealous.;)
Click to expand...
It is only you who has brought me up to par with Einstein. I just said a bit like a young Einstein. Which is hardly on par with the mature Einstein. Settle down. :)
 
Robittybob1 said:
I'm not a particularly knowledgeable physicist. I'm a bit like a young Einstein working at the patents office, riding trains and elevators to work everyday. Getting his thought experiments together day after day.
Click to expand...

Have you also developed a theory or equation like Einstein ? ... or ... Trying to develope one ?


If time at the surface of a black whole is zero
Click to expand...

This is so , because gravity of BH is very strong there .


Time at the Universe boundary might be faster than we experience it here on Earth. I wouldn't say it was infinite.
So time has it's own local rates. There still could be a Universial Time progressing. So that is like "expanding", there is more of it at the very least.
:)
Click to expand...

Do you think gravity at the Universe Boundary is very weak , so that time is faster there locally ?
 
hansda said:
Have you also developed a theory or equation like Einstein ? ... or ... Trying to develope one ?


This is so , because gravity of BH is very strong there .


Do you think gravity at the Universe Boundary is very weak , so that time is faster there locally ?
Click to expand...

My theory is covered in a thread on Physforums http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=29842&st=0
"Life First Started On Planet Mercury?, Looking for biological evidence support", that included my 4 hypotheses. There are no equations as yet.

It stands to follow if time is slowed in strong gravity fields time will be faster in low gravity fields. At the furthermost extremities if the Universe gravity would be virtually nil. Time will be a it's maximum rate.

I have no evidence for this other than logic. :)
 
Robittybob1 said:
At the furthermost extremities if the Universe gravity would be virtually nil. Time will be a it's maximum rate.

I have no evidence for this other than logic. :)
Click to expand...

Hmm, could you point to where the furthermost extremities of the universe are? Hint: you can't, anymore than you can point to the center of the universe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top