And if I publish my calcules to get that answer YOU and SOME OTHERS will insult me even though they are now (I've about finished counting) correct.
Atleast they are in the right scale.
Atleast they are in the right scale.
Gravitomagnetism Versus Cern & Neutrinoflow, Disastrous?
- Thread starter Smellsniffsniff
- Start date
- Status
So you're "supporting" your nonsense with more nonsense.
Evidence?
How? And how have you you verified your previous equation? Again.
You're trolling again.
Want me to publish the equations?
the contraction of the upper radius is by my equation which is accurate r(1 + (v-w)/c) = r
with v and w being the speeds of the masses. That's why my previous equation is only somewhat accurate, but still accurate enough.
That is why we divide the radius distribution with that.
And multiply with the radius distribution of the z,y plane r√(2-2(v(v+c)/c)^2)
And then we multiply the masses with the above z,y relativistic factor
and we end up with:
(1 + (v-w)/c)*G*(sphere to cylinder relation)*m(1)*m(2)/r
the contraction of the upper radius is by my equation which is accurate r(1 + (v-w)/c) = r
with v and w being the speeds of the masses. That's why my previous equation is only somewhat accurate, but still accurate enough.
That is why we divide the radius distribution with that.
And multiply with the radius distribution of the z,y plane r√(2-2(v(v+c)/c)^2)
And then we multiply the masses with the above z,y relativistic factor
and we end up with:
(1 + (v-w)/c)*G*(sphere to cylinder relation)*m(1)*m(2)/r
Last edited:
r is radius.
It's based on that the z,y plane has another relativistic factor then the x plane.
so in the triangle with the hypothenus ct(0) and catets vt(1) and ct(1,z,y) we have t(1,z,y) being contracted while the x plane is less or more so (depending on if there is speed against rest or positive speed), and that's why grow out of control perpendicular to the movement direction in the same way, and that's why, probably, there will be a gravitomagnetical force. That decrease only with radius, and change the temperature in the sun.
It's based on that the z,y plane has another relativistic factor then the x plane.
so in the triangle with the hypothenus ct(0) and catets vt(1) and ct(1,z,y) we have t(1,z,y) being contracted while the x plane is less or more so (depending on if there is speed against rest or positive speed), and that's why grow out of control perpendicular to the movement direction in the same way, and that's why, probably, there will be a gravitomagnetical force. That decrease only with radius, and change the temperature in the sun.
"Relativistic factor"?
Word salad.
What's a "catets"?
What do you mean by "speed against rest or positive speed"?
Why would it "grow out of control"
*** MOD NOTE ***
You're still trolling incomprehesnsibly. Unless you actually start making sense this thread will be locked and cesspooled.
Come here, listen;
In the accelerator they have a x-wise dilation in the relation (1 +/- v/c) : 1
But the z,y dilation can be solved by the triangle:
ct(1) ->
vt(1)/(1 +/- v/c)(0) down
ct(1:z,y) ->
From solving it, we see that when v is negative, x will be comprimated to zero at c.
so then the rest of the force only decrease with radius.
That is why there would be a such gravitomagnetical force from cern that disrupts the sun, not only neutrinoflows.
In the accelerator they have a x-wise dilation in the relation (1 +/- v/c) : 1
But the z,y dilation can be solved by the triangle:
ct(1) ->
vt(1)/(1 +/- v/c)(0) down
ct(1:z,y) ->
From solving it, we see that when v is negative, x will be comprimated to zero at c.
so then the rest of the force only decrease with radius.
That is why there would be a such gravitomagnetical force from cern that disrupts the sun, not only neutrinoflows.
More word salad.
Dilation of what?
What is a "comprimation"?
You have already been informed that your "triangle" explanation is not valid at near-C speeds.
*** MOD NOTE ***
Last warning. Answer the questions instead of posting nonsense.
Dilation of the gravitons reach.
By comprimation I meant that the gravitons reach will lessen to zero x-wise.
If it is not valid, why don't you tell that to yourself when I callibrate a force from cern that would kill everyone of us, moderator.
By comprimation I meant that the gravitons reach will lessen to zero x-wise.
If it is not valid, why don't you tell that to yourself when I callibrate a force from cern that would kill everyone of us, moderator.
- Status