Let's build a universe, I guess, since some folks feel this is too basic and difficult to understand. More accurately this is too difficult for me to understand.
Does Redshift express velocity? ‘Why yes dumb Scott it does’, but not how you understand velocity with your subpar intellect and inferior cosmological background…. harrumph, I mean really Scott… distance over time to express velocity? How Verbose!
It is possible fellas, and I quite like the implications, that “cosmologically significant redshift”, is more conveniently attributable to Gravity (more accurately the depression in space-time caused by mass) redshift than it is due to expansion redshift. There is no Dark Energy needed, no paradoxically unique math, and no egocentricity to excuse, or even address.
Is there no one who has an interest in fully exhausting another model, or do we know all we possibly can within the confines of theoretical, cosmological, physics? I think not.
Does Redshift express velocity? ‘Why yes dumb Scott it does’, but not how you understand velocity with your subpar intellect and inferior cosmological background…. harrumph, I mean really Scott… distance over time to express velocity? How Verbose!
It is possible fellas, and I quite like the implications, that “cosmologically significant redshift”, is more conveniently attributable to Gravity (more accurately the depression in space-time caused by mass) redshift than it is due to expansion redshift. There is no Dark Energy needed, no paradoxically unique math, and no egocentricity to excuse, or even address.
Is there no one who has an interest in fully exhausting another model, or do we know all we possibly can within the confines of theoretical, cosmological, physics? I think not.