DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
Well, we only have a data point of one. Maybe that was just a crummy example.
I ... didn't invent it. I don't know the rules or theme or anything.what would u add tho man
If you stop and think about it, this is not true.
There is no reason why pointing NW couldn't carry you 10,000 miles around the globe. It could simply be a great circle that connects the start point to the end point with the shortest possible route.
The point is, it doesn't rule it out. That's you imposing a subjective restriction.Potentially outside this topic's context. But here "and beyond" doesn't entail absolute continuance.
Nowhere in the instructions does it say "Step 2: stop and make sure you're still heading North-West"....the direction down from the Arctic transforms to no longer being NW.
The point is, it doesn't rule it out. That's you imposing a subjective restriction.
If we hadn't found a qualifying country in the near distance, we would continue along a straight line (Great Circle) until we did.
Your way is restrictive; it may give up while there are still potentially valid solutions to be had.
How did you know? Or did you check?Yes, but "since there's no point entering the polar region and beyond" is not a method or approach. Much less one with universal application over varying "guessing game" scenarios. It's just expressing knowledge that there are no countries with five borders to be had by entering the Arctic and continuing to North America.
On the contrary, I would have thought that would be the "challenge" part.Grounded in a good-faith assumption (not without risk) that the Original Poster was not a joker, and thereby practical minimalism probably applied rather than the excess of pursuing a circle around the globe.
_