Personal View
I do believe this extract from UniKEF fits this topic.
http://groups.msn.com/McCoinUniKEFTheory/home.htm
UniKEF Origin of Existance
UniKEF proposes that "0" is linked to Existance via a form of mobius. This segment is an attempt to break down "0" into its constituant parts. The initial idea that 0 = (+1)+(-1) has now been modified to be 0 = (+n)+(-n) to mathematically signify a range of creations.
The idea of our origin or existance is a paradox.
Science holds a view that something cannot come from nothing.
That energy cannot be created nor destroyed but can only change forms.
That view creates its own paradox.
***********
The conventional view is that "coming into existence" from "nothing", or passing "out of existence" back into "nothing", clearly requires magic, a miracle, or a supernatural act of a God.
That is a logical impossibility by definition of "nothing", meaning non-existence or the total absence of forms at any scale.
Or that "Something" was never created from "Nothing" because it has always existed.
**********
My personal view and that imposed on UniKEF is purely mathematical:
0 = (+n)+(-n) provides a diverse sequence of origin forms.
This is actually a beautiful and profound mathematical expression for creation.
When accepted at face value it says many things.
Not that we can understand it yet.
1 - "0" is "NOTHINGNESS"; absolute absence of anything.
2 - It is a mathematical foundation for our "Existance" coming from "Nothing" which does not invoke magic, miracles or Gods.
3 - The recipocal of "absolute nothing" is infinity but until "All" of "Nothing" becomes "Someting", no physical property will ever become Infinite.
Taken as an unknown and perhaps unknowable it has a comfortable feel.
In UniKEF I propose a form of mobius where "0" and "Infinity" are opposites with common origin. That White Holes are Black Holes. It is a place where non-existance and creation and time achieve a triple point.
It is the Chiral Condensate, the "Vacuum or Void" of "Empty" space.
You want proof. Got none. But my view is mathematically supportable. That is one up on magic, miracles, Gods or Physical Infinity.
And now there is scientific evidence that particle pairs pop into and out of existance.
0---------->(+n)+(-n) = creation
(+n)+(-n)----------->0 anihilation
Dan K. McCoin
UniKEF Author
***************** Clarification of Principle ****************
Lets take a hypothetical case. We are going to assume that existance is anything that deviates from "0F" in a bucket of water at 0F (Universe). We cool a ball bearing to -60F using (-n) energy created as above and another equal size and density ball bearing to +60F by the same means using the + energy counter part.
You dunk them into the bucket and they will equalize at 0F. The +/- energy no longer exists. It cancelled, conservation is maintained. It is not stored as +/-F's they vanish and do not exist in the bucket of reality.
To try and clarify what I have said let me restate the above case.
The bucket, water and ball bearings are "Something", they consist of a condensed form of pure energy by E=mc^2. But it is the scientific view that energy can not be created nor destroyed that is in error here. The fact that we cannot yet do it doesnot mean that we may never learn how to do it or that the Universe is incapable of doing it.
The example clearly shows that energy contained in physical existance can and does vanish into "Nothingness". It is the simple act of conservation between +/-. When the ball bearings stablize at 0F there is no trace of their +/-60F it has vanished and can only be recovered or re-created by bifurcating "Nothing". That is splitting it into two opposites of equal value.
Existance is a mere reduction in entrophy, entrophy is an attempt to return to nothing. The energy contained (existance) in the pre-test temperature is not stored anywhere, it must be re-created from nothing.
And while man has not understood how to bifurcate "Nothing" to make "Something" makes no case for claiming that the Universe has no such capacity.
Having such capacity means our existance can be realized without the invocation of miracles, Gods or infinities.
The ball bearings in the above case are just for an analogy. We are not taking energy from one (cooling) and applying it to the other (heating). In that case energy would have only been transferred from one to another. Nothing was created.
But what the case shows is that assuming the "Creation" of +/- energy as stated from O (Nothingness) and applying that to each ball bearing will have the same affect on temperature. And placing them in the bucket of reality you can see them vanish or be destroyed. If assuming that this analogy shows energy can be destroyed then there is no reason to assume that energy could not be created by the reverse process.
The thought experiment becomes its own proof. Assume the energy was so created and you can show that it can be destroyed. Hence logically it can also be so created.
The issue of are we + or - is mute or arbitrary. Which ever we are there exists an opposite. It is a form of parallel universes but that does not imply (nor exclude) a mirrow immage Universe. It does require an opposite filled resovoir of energy which may or may not condense into matter and have life in some form.
It is the +/- energy that must be conserved, not the form that those energies take in their respective Universes.
