God is dead, he is fictitious, fake!
No such thing called God that really exists,
if he is true, why not he shows up himself?
An omnipotent God can show himself to be true in many ways, we do not need to teach him,
but he simply could not, therefore he is fake.
This is a place of science. Religion is antiscience so it receives no respect here. Neither do people who proselytize religion.NOTE JAMES R. Here one of your apostols is preaching atheism.
God is dead, he is fictitious, fake!
No such thing called God that really exists,
if he is true, why not he shows up himself?
An omnipotent God can show himself to be true in many ways, we do not need to teach him,
but he simply could not, therefore he is fake.
This is a place of science. Religion is antiscience so it receives no respect here. Neither do people who proselytize religion.
Get used to it. We maintain a "Religion" subforum so we can always find something stupid to laugh at. This is the way your posts will always be received.
If you want to spout your supernaturalist bullshit on the internet, find somewhere else to do it. You're not welcome here, except to be treated as a clown.
And by the way, the word is spelled "apostle."
Religion is antiscience so it receives no respect here.
This is a place of science. Religion is antiscience so it receives no respect here. Neither do people who proselytize religion.
Get used to it. We maintain a "Religion" subforum so we can always find something stupid to laugh at. This is the way your posts will always be received.
If you want to spout your supernaturalist bullshit on the internet, find somewhere else to do it. You're not welcome here, except to be treated as a clown.
And by the way, the word is spelled "apostle."
Depends on the exact concept at play in the argument. You mention below the three-omni type, which implies the classical monotheistic god. But that is far from the only conception, and its limitations do not necessarily work for all of them.if he is true, why not he shows up himself?
Unfair generalisation. I know of plenty that are not, mine included.Religion is antiscience
Surely you're joking? Why would human codes of conduct have any bearing of that which is clearly super-human?If God is dead, then morality is dead, because God is the personification of morality.
God is dead, he is fictitious, fake!
No such thing called God that really exists,
if he is true, why not he shows up himself?
An omnipotent God can show himself to be true in many ways, we do not need to teach him,
but he simply could not, therefore he is fake.
This is a place of science. Religion is antiscience so it receives no respect here. Neither do people who proselytize religion.
Get used to it. We maintain a "Religion" subforum so we can always find something stupid to laugh at. This is the way your posts will always be received.
If you want to spout your supernaturalist bullshit on the internet, find somewhere else to do it. You're not welcome here, except to be treated as a clown.
NOTE JAMES R. Here one of your apostols is preaching atheism.
This is a place of science. Religion is antiscience so it receives no respect here.
Neither do people who proselytize religion.
Get used to it. We maintain a "Religion" subforum so we can always find something stupid to laugh at.
If God is dead, then morality is dead, because God is the personification of morality.
arauca:
Saint's opinions are his own to express. They have nothing to do with me.
And, in case you have a misconception, I don't give a damn whether you're a Christian, a Buddhist, a Zoroastrian, a Zaruba practitioner, or an atheist. I have no interest in trying to convert you to anything.
You, on the other hand, seem profoundly worried that some other people don't believe exactly what you believe. I imagine that if you had the power to ban all atheists on this site you would do so. And yet, you are still here, acting as a poor role model for Christians everywhere. Go figure.
.
You are as wrong as day and night . You are as phoney as a $ 3. bill. Action speak louder the your justification, and that is what you have shown.
arauca, when you choose to rant, that is YOUR ACTION. It is not proper to wield a weapon, only to complain when your chosen opponent uses that same weapon in retaliation.
arauca, when you point one accusing finger at someone, you do realize that you are pointing three of your own fingers back at yourself while maintaining that action, do you not?
I do not know what Bible or Book you claim to follow. You are, however, welcome to Post the Passages in said Bible or Book, where it states that name calling and accusations are the chosen method of showing your faith and walking in the Path of whatever Deity you claim to represent.
Only in your culture. Obviously there are other cultures that are also moral. Simply because without morality there is no culture or society.If God is dead, then morality is dead, because God is the personification of morality.
Humans can extend their perception with instruments. Science also makes a clear distinction between what is supported by evidence and what is just an educated guess. Many aspects of quantum physics are certainly science. Computers based on quantum principles have already been built.Whats funny is all these poeple claiming humans know it all.
Science can only go so far, and then it becomes all based on faith, with no science behind it. Quantum physics is just another religion, but they call it that to put people off questioning it. Humans can only go so far with science, and when it gets too small to observe, everything just turns into faith, like any religion.
So stop claiming that science knows all they do not, and never will. Quantum physics has virtually nout to do anything scientific, its just another religion, but this time one from people whom claim they understand it, lol, like we have not heard that from all religions before.
Humans only know as much as there perception allows, beyond that and most of reality is beyond that, its all faith.
So science will never prove anything beyond a certain point, so stop with these threads. Beyond a certain point science turns into a religion, how ironic is that?