I fail to see a pattern in God's wrath, as presented in the Old and New Testament. In fact, it seems quite arbitrary: a killer bear here, a pillar of salt there, a little genocide over there.
Incest is approved of in Genesis and Exodus, condemned in Leviticus. What changed? Onan was killed for "pulling out" of his brother's wife. (So, simply because the culture of that time commanded Onan to bear children with his deceased brother's wife, God happened to agree.) Now, men who have sex with their dead brother's wives end up on the Jerry Springer Show at most.
As the saying goes, "Whatever man believes, God believes." The Bible is no more consistent than society itself. God approved of slavery in the Old Testament. Find me a middle-class suburban Christian today who would say God approves of slavery today. Why the switch? Simple. Because the people of that time needed an all-powerful entity to approve of their livelihood. Society is what changes; religion is usually bringing up the rear.
God's judgment in the Bible is not based on any objective slide rule of Truth; it's based on man's own prejudices (amplified to fit the mold a deity). Hence, God gets "mad" and throws fits, and the like. Is God still enforcing that Onan rule today? Should we still be killed for working on the Sabbath?
"No," people say, "God changed his mind" or "Jesus changed everything."
If God's judgment is logical and consistent, then it must be somewhat predictable. So, tell me, is it OK to own slaves? Present me with a consistent pattern of God's behavior on this issue.
Josh
====================
"It's just a ride." - Bill Hicks
====================