For all you athiests out there
- Thread starter JoojooSpaceape
- Start date
Originally posted by Jade Squirrel
I'll have to agree with Prisme. I think the content of doom's posts is tasteless and not very conducive to intelligent discussion.
JoojooSpaceape and Prisme, I hope you don't believe that these are common characteristics of atheists (I acknowledge that doom has declared himself/herself an agnostic). Have a great day!
I think all of what religous people say is unintelligent dipshit waffle,so we could be just as bad.
Difference is if he spoke like i do hed have to keep getting absolved of his sins,which means his life just plain sucks,get a life.
I like sins,sins are cool,thats what a life is,when youre actually living it the way you want,not by some stupid dipshit book,i read books sure on various things,but take it all with a pinch of salt and only believe what i wanna believe.
If you dont like what i have to say,just ignore it,im not holding a gun to your head to read my rubbish,if i deeply disturb's you and gives you nightmares!
and you cry to mommy GOOD!
you deserve it for being a cry baby bitch
.Voodoo Child
Registered Senior Member
A simple joke. God being a self-proclaimed know-it-all and somewhat ambigious. Granted that is the popular conception of God and not neccesarily your own. When I next make a joke I will enclose it in W3C compliant joke tags, with the appropriate properties. eg.
<joke type='knockknock'> joke here </joke>
so that you'll know it is a joke and you won't give yourself an unneccessary stroke. Now that's service.
Re: Tasteless...
To be honest if i affect people to go to as much trouble as banning for good,then not only do they have no sense of humour whatsoever and totally worthless,but it means there dipshits like you that actually respond to my dribble,and have to push it a step further in a vain attempt to affect me in my personal life.
Of which i might as well state i do not care.
Hey why stop there,why not call the FBI in case i am really a nutter that will chop you up
To be honest if i affect people to go to as much trouble as banning for good,then not only do they have no sense of humour whatsoever and totally worthless,but it means there dipshits like you that actually respond to my dribble,and have to push it a step further in a vain attempt to affect me in my personal life.
Of which i might as well state i do not care.
Hey why stop there,why not call the FBI in case i am really a nutter that will chop you up
Wow, you guys all suck, can you please move to the thread
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=21665
let that man of jooj guy reply to some stuff that has to do with his original post
ZERO MASS
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=21665
let that man of jooj guy reply to some stuff that has to do with his original post
ZERO MASS
True Wisdom
Registered Senior Member
If you claim you're agnostic then that means you do not deny nor confirm the existence of a supreme being. But obviously you were offended by someone else's enlightenmnet. If someone found happiness and love for THEMSELF, how does that offend you in any way?
True Wisdom
Registered Senior Member
At least you're honest.Back to the original post:
i have a suggestion for a book to read... "the case for christ"
I didn't find it all that convincing. The same arguments can (and have) been used for most other religions. Then some assumptions he makes are just wrong. He uses the same reasoning as we have been seeing for years, but dresses it up nicer. Strobel's work is obviously biased, and lacks any real depth.
He also makes false assumptions. He claims that records written near closer to biblical times must be historically accurate, but one need only look at the resurection accounts to see how 'accurate'. He also assumes myths take a long time to form. However, parts of the bible were written over 50 years after the subject time. With an average lifespan of under 30 at the time, this is 2 generations before the story was written in which it may have been changed. Think 'the whispering game' on a larger more complicated scale.
i have a suggestion for a book to read... "the case for christ"
I didn't find it all that convincing. The same arguments can (and have) been used for most other religions. Then some assumptions he makes are just wrong. He uses the same reasoning as we have been seeing for years, but dresses it up nicer. Strobel's work is obviously biased, and lacks any real depth.
He also makes false assumptions. He claims that records written near closer to biblical times must be historically accurate, but one need only look at the resurection accounts to see how 'accurate'. He also assumes myths take a long time to form. However, parts of the bible were written over 50 years after the subject time. With an average lifespan of under 30 at the time, this is 2 generations before the story was written in which it may have been changed. Think 'the whispering game' on a larger more complicated scale.