Are male minds weak as a result of the assimilation of women holding equal status or near it in society? Because I just had a kind of revelation about this. The need for religion to provide shelter is an accessory of civilization (Yeah I know what you're thinking, but this is really my own revelation). The simplicity in retreating from fear and responsibility is another example of why large numbers of men are beginning to feel and become effeminate. If we remove objects and symbols, we won't have religion. Either in the mind or in the physical world. Objects of the self and society, because the images by which we are bombarded seem to stem from society itself and they become indistinguishable from the objects of the self.
Female minds
- Thread starter nicholas1M7
- Start date
Grantywanty
Registered Senior Member
I think you need to be a bit more blunt. I have my guesses as to why this post is a bit hard to understand, but I would rather not guess as to your meaning because, perhaps, you are not sure you want to be clear.
Do share. I'm curious. My brain is open.
I'm want to see what Granty means before I elaborate. Soon enough Avatar, soon enough!
A lot of women still want to screw men with muscles, is my only answer to that.
Yeah, men are weak....it's true.. I am one. That's why we play up on our insecurities. But women are f'n' nuts! So it's still an even playing field.
Soon, soon I will go to europe where people are not concerned with the differences between girls and boys past fourth grade....
I want you all to realize that the thread stater is comparing the male and female stereotypes, and those stereotypes do not fit the majority of human population. Sure, you can all prop your heads on your wrists, stare into the nearest corner, and mumble about men and women. But your mumblings will be irrelevant as soon as you glance away from that corner.
I want you all to realize that the thread stater is comparing the male and female stereotypes, and those stereotypes do not fit the majority of human population. Sure, you can all prop your heads on your wrists, stare into the nearest corner, and mumble about men and women. But your mumblings will be irrelevant as soon as you glance away from that corner.
Soon, soon I will go to europe where people are not concerned with the differences between girls and boys past fourth grade....
I want you all to realize that the thread stater is comparing the male and female stereotypes, and those stereotypes do not fit the majority of human population. Sure, you can all prop your heads on your wrists, stare into the nearest corner, and mumble about men and women. But your mumblings will be irrelevant as soon as you glance away from that corner.
Clearly you've never been to Latin America.
Or Spain.
Ah excuse me but a certain WANDERER once wrote an essay called The Feminization of Man and posted it in this very forum, concenring this, "your own revelation", very topic.
Look it up.
Or follow this link and read for yourself:
http://www.ilovephilosophy.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=143894
Interesting read.
Can you name one, ONE!!!, non-"generalization"?
One will do, you briliant female mind you.
Tell me when science studies a phenomenon, does it extrapolate the general from the hypothetically specific or does it create a science for every hypothetical specific?
Is the #1 a specific?
Is the "self"?
Tell me about the definition of "hee" and "now" and how they are not generalizations.
For instance when science makes assumptions about quazars or antelops or apples or ants, does it only refer to the particular thing and/or animal and/or organism or does it assume a universal behavior?
I would think that given your distaste for "generalizations" you would not agree with any asumptions made about chimpanzees, concenring their biology and behavior, that are made using a few spesimens or a small group.
What is psychology, biology, politics?
How dare they generalize!!!!!...and how wrong they are.
Why does marketing work at all when no general rules apply to human beings?
Are you that ....that...female?
Then, perhaps, when you've given us the definition of a non-generalization you can expand upon the existence of absolutes.
Last edited:
Thats the way, laddie - Advertise!
Seriously though, that thread was quite good in parts, but like all forums one sometimes had to wade through dross in order to find the interesting parts.
The thing about forums is that they remind of being back in school, where often the teacher was still exlpaining something a half hour later when you'd already thought about it beforehand or grasped the concept within the first five minutes. Finding something to think about while that was going on was often tedious.
School became more of an opportunity to observe my peers than a place in which I gained any actual learning.
Seriously though, that thread was quite good in parts, but like all forums one sometimes had to wade through dross in order to find the interesting parts.
The thing about forums is that they remind of being back in school, where often the teacher was still exlpaining something a half hour later when you'd already thought about it beforehand or grasped the concept within the first five minutes. Finding something to think about while that was going on was often tedious.
School became more of an opportunity to observe my peers than a place in which I gained any actual learning.
I'm not above marketing my self.
Is there something I should feel ashamed about; some mythological standard or rule of idealized nobility I should adhere to?
Furthermore, you should keep in mind that a teacher is always aware that there are different levels of students and that each might be on a different page.
He must dummy his words down to the average common denominator.
Is this your way of letting us know that you could have said it better or that you knew all this beforehand?
Advertising.......?
Darling, I gave a line and you gave me a tirade. How feminine of you. We're not on the flea market, you know.
Well, let's keep to the topic, not to the apples. There are all sorts of people. Will you sit down and tell me that all people are the same? That all women are the same? That all men are the same? Am I the same as you? Are you like any other man out there? Well I suppose all men are little pussies like you, but it's not so with women. Some women are feminine and tender, some have more testosterone than you could ever hope to have (because they take steroids, you know, and all).
Even politicians and psychiatrists classify people into different groups (into a huge number of groups) and they hastily admit there are differences between individuals. Surely an apple is an apple, but there are different sorts of apples at the market place and humans are far more complex than apples. Humans are more complex than chimpanzees, but there are different chimpanzees as well. I mean, I know you don't know much about chimps, but you should at least know about apples.
Shortly, put away those cookie cutters and keep to the fruit baskets.
p.s. for definitions of "generalization" and "assumption," go to dictionary.reference.com.